From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: tag_dsa: Fix tx from VLAN uppers on non-filtering bridges
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:32:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8womuxb.fsf@waldekranz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220308093653.c2enspat5mvah4n3@skbuf>
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:36, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:05:48PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>> In this situation (VLAN filtering disabled on br0):
>>
>> br0.10
>> /
>> br0
>> / \
>> swp0 swp1
>>
>> When a frame is transmitted from the VLAN upper, the bridge will send
>> it down to one of the switch ports with forward offloading
>> enabled. This will cause tag_dsa to generate a FORWARD tag. Before
>> this change, that tag would have it's VID set to 10, even though VID
>> 10 is not loaded in the VTU.
>>
>> Before the blamed commit, the frame would trigger a VTU miss and be
>> forwarded according to the PVT configuration. Now that all fabric
>> ports are in 802.1Q secure mode, the frame is dropped instead.
>>
>> Therefore, restrict the condition under which we rewrite an 802.1Q tag
>> to a DSA tag. On standalone port's, reuse is always safe since we will
>> always generate FROM_CPU tags in that case. For bridged ports though,
>> we must ensure that VLAN filtering is enabled, which in turn
>> guarantees that the VID in question is loaded into the VTU.
>>
>> Fixes: d352b20f4174 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Improve multichip isolation of standalone ports")
>> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
>> ---
>> net/dsa/tag_dsa.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c b/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
>> index c8b4bbd46191..e4b6e3f2a3db 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
>> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *dsa_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>> u8 extra)
>> {
>> struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
>> + struct net_device *br_dev;
>> u8 tag_dev, tag_port;
>> enum dsa_cmd cmd;
>> u8 *dsa_header;
>> @@ -149,7 +150,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *dsa_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>> tag_port = dp->index;
>> }
>>
>> - if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) {
>> + br_dev = dsa_port_bridge_dev_get(dp);
>> +
>> + /* If frame is already 802.1Q tagged, we can convert it to a DSA
>> + * tag (avoiding a memmove), but only if the port is standalone
>> + * (in which case we always send FROM_CPU) or if the port's
>> + * bridge has VLAN filtering enabled (in which case the CPU port
>> + * will be a member of the VLAN).
>> + */
>> + if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
>> + (!br_dev || br_vlan_enabled(br_dev))) {
>
> Conservative patch. If !br_dev, we could/should inject using
> MV88E6XXX_VID_STANDALONE. But since we use FROM_CPU, the classified VLAN
> probably does not make a difference that I can see, so there is no
> reason to change this now (and certainly not in the same patch).
We could also do that. My reasoning was:
1. There is no functional difference with a FROM_CPU frame - the CPU's
word is law.
2. Performance should be better since you can avoid a per-packet memmove
to make room for the tag, if the non-ethertyped version of DSA is
used.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 11:05 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: tag_dsa: Fix tx from VLAN uppers on non-filtering bridges Tobias Waldekranz
2022-03-07 22:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-03-08 9:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-08 13:32 ` Tobias Waldekranz [this message]
2022-03-08 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v8womuxb.fsf@waldekranz.com \
--to=tobias@waldekranz.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.