From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/gt: Pull ring submission resume under its caller forcewake
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:55:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9btjiw4.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119094053.6919-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Take advantage of calling xcs_resume under a forcewake by using direct
> mmio access. In particular, we can avoid the sleeping variants to allow
> resume to be called from softirq context, required for engine resets.
>
> v2: Keep the positing read at the start of resume as a guardian memory
> barrier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c | 93 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c
> index 44159595d909..bf2834424add 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c
> @@ -122,31 +122,27 @@ static void set_hwsp(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 offset)
> hwsp = RING_HWS_PGA(engine->mmio_base);
> }
>
> - intel_uncore_write(engine->uncore, hwsp, offset);
> - intel_uncore_posting_read(engine->uncore, hwsp);
> + intel_uncore_write_fw(engine->uncore, hwsp, offset);
> + intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(engine->uncore, hwsp);
> }
>
> static void flush_cs_tlb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
> -
> - if (!IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 6, 7))
> + if (!IS_GEN_RANGE(engine->i915, 6, 7))
> return;
>
> /* ring should be idle before issuing a sync flush*/
> - drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
> - (ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_MI_MODE) & MODE_IDLE) == 0);
> + GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON((ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_MI_MODE) & MODE_IDLE) == 0);
>
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_INSTPM,
> - _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(INSTPM_TLB_INVALIDATE |
> - INSTPM_SYNC_FLUSH));
> - if (intel_wait_for_register(engine->uncore,
> - RING_INSTPM(engine->mmio_base),
> - INSTPM_SYNC_FLUSH, 0,
> - 1000))
> - drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> - "%s: wait for SyncFlush to complete for TLB invalidation timed out\n",
> - engine->name);
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine, RING_INSTPM,
> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(INSTPM_TLB_INVALIDATE |
> + INSTPM_SYNC_FLUSH));
> + if (__intel_wait_for_register_fw(engine->uncore,
> + RING_INSTPM(engine->mmio_base),
> + INSTPM_SYNC_FLUSH, 0,
> + 2000, 0, NULL))
> + ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
> + "wait for SyncFlush to complete for TLB invalidation timed out\n");
> }
>
> static void ring_setup_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -177,13 +173,13 @@ static void set_pp_dir(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (!vm)
> return;
>
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_PP_DIR_DCLV, PP_DIR_DCLV_2G);
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_PP_DIR_BASE, pp_dir(vm));
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine, RING_PP_DIR_DCLV, PP_DIR_DCLV_2G);
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine, RING_PP_DIR_BASE, pp_dir(vm));
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 7) {
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine,
> - RING_MODE_GEN7,
> - _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_PPGTT_ENABLE));
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine,
> + RING_MODE_GEN7,
> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_PPGTT_ENABLE));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -191,13 +187,10 @@ static int xcs_resume(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
> struct intel_ring *ring = engine->legacy.ring;
> - int ret = 0;
>
> ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "ring:{HEAD:%04x, TAIL:%04x}\n",
> ring->head, ring->tail);
>
> - intel_uncore_forcewake_get(engine->uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> -
> if (HWS_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev_priv))
> ring_setup_phys_status_page(engine);
> else
> @@ -214,7 +207,7 @@ static int xcs_resume(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> * also enforces ordering), otherwise the hw might lose the new ring
> * register values.
> */
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_START, i915_ggtt_offset(ring->vma));
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine, RING_START, i915_ggtt_offset(ring->vma));
>
> /* Check that the ring offsets point within the ring! */
> GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_ring_offset_valid(ring, ring->head));
> @@ -224,46 +217,44 @@ static int xcs_resume(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> set_pp_dir(engine);
>
> /* First wake the ring up to an empty/idle ring */
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_HEAD, ring->head);
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_TAIL, ring->head);
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine, RING_HEAD, ring->head);
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine, RING_TAIL, ring->head);
> ENGINE_POSTING_READ(engine, RING_TAIL);
>
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_CTL, RING_CTL_SIZE(ring->size) | RING_VALID);
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine, RING_CTL,
> + RING_CTL_SIZE(ring->size) | RING_VALID);
>
> /* If the head is still not zero, the ring is dead */
> - if (intel_wait_for_register(engine->uncore,
> - RING_CTL(engine->mmio_base),
> - RING_VALID, RING_VALID,
> - 50)) {
> - drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "%s initialization failed "
> - "ctl %08x (valid? %d) head %08x [%08x] tail %08x [%08x] start %08x [expected %08x]\n",
> - engine->name,
> - ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_CTL),
> - ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_CTL) & RING_VALID,
> - ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_HEAD), ring->head,
> - ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_TAIL), ring->tail,
> - ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_START),
> - i915_ggtt_offset(ring->vma));
> - ret = -EIO;
> - goto out;
> + if (__intel_wait_for_register_fw(engine->uncore,
> + RING_CTL(engine->mmio_base),
> + RING_VALID, RING_VALID,
> + 5000, 0, NULL)) {
> + drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "%s initialization failed; "
> + "ctl %08x (valid? %d) head %08x [%08x] tail %08x [%08x] start %08x [expected %08x]\n",
> + engine->name,
> + ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_CTL),
> + ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_CTL) & RING_VALID,
> + ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_HEAD), ring->head,
> + ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_TAIL), ring->tail,
> + ENGINE_READ(engine, RING_START),
> + i915_ggtt_offset(ring->vma));
> + return -EIO;
> }
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) > 2)
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine,
> - RING_MI_MODE, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(STOP_RING));
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine,
> + RING_MI_MODE, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(STOP_RING));
>
> /* Now awake, let it get started */
> if (ring->tail != ring->head) {
> - ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_TAIL, ring->tail);
> + ENGINE_WRITE_FW(engine, RING_TAIL, ring->tail);
> ENGINE_POSTING_READ(engine, RING_TAIL);
> }
>
> /* Papering over lost _interrupts_ immediately following the restart */
> intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(engine);
> -out:
> - intel_uncore_forcewake_put(engine->uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void sanitize_hwsp(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> --
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 9:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare the selftests for engine resets with ring submission Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 10:26 ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-01-19 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/gt: Lift stop_ring() to reset_prepare Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 10:33 ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-01-19 10:39 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/gt: Pull ring submission resume under its caller forcewake Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 10:55 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2021-01-19 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Mark per-engine-reset as supported on gen7 Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 11:00 ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-01-19 11:06 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals Abodunrin, Akeem G
2021-01-19 10:25 ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-01-19 10:34 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 10:59 ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-01-19 13:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/5] " Patchwork
2021-01-19 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9btjiw4.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.