From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>, Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm: mmu: Replace unsigned with unsigned int for PTE access
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 13:00:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9olkzw4.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203230911.39755-1-bgardon@google.com>
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> writes:
> There are several functions which pass an access permission mask for
> SPTEs as an unsigned. This works, but checkpatch complains about it.
> Switch the occurrences of unsigned to unsigned int to satisfy checkpatch.
>
> No functional change expected.
>
> Tested by running kvm-unit-tests on an Intel Haswell machine. This
> commit introduced no new failures.
>
> This commit can be viewed in Gerrit at:
> https://linux-review.googlesource.com/c/virt/kvm/kvm/+/2358
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 84eeb61d06aa3..a9c593dec49bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static u64 get_mmio_spte_generation(u64 spte)
> }
>
> static void mark_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, u64 gfn,
> - unsigned access)
> + unsigned int access)
> {
> u64 gen = kvm_vcpu_memslots(vcpu)->generation & MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK;
> u64 mask = generation_mmio_spte_mask(gen);
> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static unsigned get_mmio_spte_access(u64 spte)
> }
>
> static bool set_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, gfn_t gfn,
> - kvm_pfn_t pfn, unsigned access)
> + kvm_pfn_t pfn, unsigned int access)
> {
> if (unlikely(is_noslot_pfn(pfn))) {
> mark_mmio_spte(vcpu, sptep, gfn, access);
> @@ -2475,7 +2475,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> gva_t gaddr,
> unsigned level,
> int direct,
> - unsigned access)
> + unsigned int access)
> {
> union kvm_mmu_page_role role;
> unsigned quadrant;
> @@ -2990,7 +2990,7 @@ static bool kvm_is_mmio_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> #define SET_SPTE_NEED_REMOTE_TLB_FLUSH BIT(1)
>
> static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> - unsigned pte_access, int level,
> + unsigned int pte_access, int level,
> gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, bool speculative,
> bool can_unsync, bool host_writable)
> {
> @@ -3081,9 +3081,10 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, unsigned pte_access,
> - int write_fault, int level, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> - bool speculative, bool host_writable)
> +static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> + unsigned int pte_access, int write_fault, int level,
> + gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, bool speculative,
> + bool host_writable)
> {
> int was_rmapped = 0;
> int rmap_count;
> @@ -3165,7 +3166,7 @@ static int direct_pte_prefetch_many(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> {
> struct page *pages[PTE_PREFETCH_NUM];
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> - unsigned access = sp->role.access;
> + unsigned int access = sp->role.access;
> int i, ret;
> gfn_t gfn;
>
> @@ -3400,7 +3401,8 @@ static int kvm_handle_bad_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> }
>
> static bool handle_abnormal_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, gfn_t gfn,
> - kvm_pfn_t pfn, unsigned access, int *ret_val)
> + kvm_pfn_t pfn, unsigned int access,
> + int *ret_val)
> {
> /* The pfn is invalid, report the error! */
> if (unlikely(is_error_pfn(pfn))) {
> @@ -4005,7 +4007,7 @@ static int handle_mmio_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct)
>
> if (is_mmio_spte(spte)) {
> gfn_t gfn = get_mmio_spte_gfn(spte);
> - unsigned access = get_mmio_spte_access(spte);
> + unsigned int access = get_mmio_spte_access(spte);
>
> if (!check_mmio_spte(vcpu, spte))
> return RET_PF_INVALID;
> @@ -4349,7 +4351,7 @@ static void inject_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
>
> static bool sync_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, gfn_t gfn,
> - unsigned access, int *nr_present)
> + unsigned int access, int *nr_present)
> {
> if (unlikely(is_mmio_spte(*sptep))) {
> if (gfn != get_mmio_spte_gfn(*sptep)) {
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 23:09 [PATCH 1/3] kvm: mmu: Replace unsigned with unsigned int for PTE access Ben Gardon
2020-02-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvm: mmu: Separate generating and setting mmio ptes Ben Gardon
2020-02-05 13:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-05 14:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvm: mmu: Separate pte generation from set_spte Ben Gardon
2020-02-05 13:52 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-05 14:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-05 12:00 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-02-05 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm: mmu: Replace unsigned with unsigned int for PTE access Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9olkzw4.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.