From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/16] cputlb: Move ROM handling from I/O path to TLB path
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 01:16:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9th9qnz.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190923230004.9231-9-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:
> It does not require going through the whole I/O path
> in order to discard a write.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> include/exec/cpu-all.h | 5 ++++-
> include/exec/cpu-common.h | 1 -
> accel/tcg/cputlb.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> exec.c | 41 +--------------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-all.h b/include/exec/cpu-all.h
> index d148bded35..26547cd6dd 100644
> --- a/include/exec/cpu-all.h
> +++ b/include/exec/cpu-all.h
<snip>
> @@ -822,16 +821,17 @@ void tlb_set_page_with_attrs(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong vaddr,
>
> tn.addr_write = -1;
> if (prot & PAGE_WRITE) {
> - if ((memory_region_is_ram(section->mr) && section->readonly)
> - || memory_region_is_romd(section->mr)) {
> - /* Write access calls the I/O callback. */
> - tn.addr_write = address | TLB_MMIO;
> - } else if (memory_region_is_ram(section->mr)
> - && cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(
> - memory_region_get_ram_addr(section->mr) + xlat)) {
> - tn.addr_write = address | TLB_NOTDIRTY;
> - } else {
> - tn.addr_write = address;
> + tn.addr_write = address;
> + if (memory_region_is_romd(section->mr)) {
> + /* Use the MMIO path so that the device can switch states. */
> + tn.addr_write |= TLB_MMIO;
> + } else if (memory_region_is_ram(section->mr)) {
> + if (section->readonly) {
> + tn.addr_write |= TLB_ROM;
> + } else if (cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(
> + memory_region_get_ram_addr(section->mr) + xlat)) {
> + tn.addr_write |= TLB_NOTDIRTY;
> + }
This reads a bit weird because we are saying romd isn't a ROM but
something that identifies as RAM can be ROM rather than just a memory
protected piece of RAM.
> }
> if (prot & PAGE_WRITE_INV) {
> tn.addr_write |= TLB_INVALID_MASK;
So at the moment I don't see what the TLB_ROM flag gives us that setting
TLB_INVALID doesn't - either way we won't make the write to our
ram-not-ram-rom.
> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static uint64_t io_readx(CPUArchState *env, CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry,
> mr = section->mr;
> mr_offset = (iotlbentry->addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + addr;
> cpu->mem_io_pc = retaddr;
> - if (mr != &io_mem_rom && mr != &io_mem_notdirty && !cpu->can_do_io) {
> + if (mr != &io_mem_notdirty && !cpu->can_do_io) {
> cpu_io_recompile(cpu, retaddr);
> }
>
> @@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ static void io_writex(CPUArchState *env, CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry,
> section = iotlb_to_section(cpu, iotlbentry->addr, iotlbentry->attrs);
> mr = section->mr;
> mr_offset = (iotlbentry->addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + addr;
> - if (mr != &io_mem_rom && mr != &io_mem_notdirty && !cpu->can_do_io) {
> + if (mr != &io_mem_notdirty && !cpu->can_do_io) {
> cpu_io_recompile(cpu, retaddr);
> }
> cpu->mem_io_vaddr = addr;
> @@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ void *probe_access(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, int size,
> }
>
> /* Reject I/O access, or other required slow-path. */
> - if (tlb_addr & (TLB_NOTDIRTY | TLB_MMIO | TLB_BSWAP)) {
> + if (tlb_addr & (TLB_NOTDIRTY | TLB_MMIO | TLB_BSWAP | TLB_ROM)) {
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -1613,6 +1613,11 @@ store_helper(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, uint64_t val,
> return;
> }
>
> + /* Ignore writes to ROM. */
> + if (unlikely(tlb_addr & TLB_ROM)) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> haddr = (void *)((uintptr_t)addr + entry->addend);
>
> if (unlikely(need_swap)) {
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index 5f2587b621..ea8c0b18ac 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static MemoryRegion *system_io;
> AddressSpace address_space_io;
> AddressSpace address_space_memory;
>
> -MemoryRegion io_mem_rom, io_mem_notdirty;
> +MemoryRegion io_mem_notdirty;
> static MemoryRegion io_mem_unassigned;
> #endif
>
> @@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ typedef struct subpage_t {
>
> #define PHYS_SECTION_UNASSIGNED 0
> #define PHYS_SECTION_NOTDIRTY 1
> -#define PHYS_SECTION_ROM 2
>
> static void io_mem_init(void);
> static void memory_map_init(void);
> @@ -1475,8 +1474,6 @@ hwaddr memory_region_section_get_iotlb(CPUState *cpu,
> iotlb = memory_region_get_ram_addr(section->mr) + xlat;
> if (!section->readonly) {
> iotlb |= PHYS_SECTION_NOTDIRTY;
> - } else {
> - iotlb |= PHYS_SECTION_ROM;
> }
> } else {
> AddressSpaceDispatch *d;
> @@ -3002,38 +2999,6 @@ static uint16_t dummy_section(PhysPageMap *map, FlatView *fv, MemoryRegion *mr)
> return phys_section_add(map, §ion);
> }
>
> -static void readonly_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> - uint64_t val, unsigned size)
> -{
> - /* Ignore any write to ROM. */
> -}
> -
> -static bool readonly_mem_accepts(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> - unsigned size, bool is_write,
> - MemTxAttrs attrs)
> -{
> - return is_write;
> -}
> -
> -/* This will only be used for writes, because reads are special cased
> - * to directly access the underlying host ram.
> - */
> -static const MemoryRegionOps readonly_mem_ops = {
> - .write = readonly_mem_write,
> - .valid.accepts = readonly_mem_accepts,
> - .endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN,
> - .valid = {
> - .min_access_size = 1,
> - .max_access_size = 8,
> - .unaligned = false,
> - },
> - .impl = {
> - .min_access_size = 1,
> - .max_access_size = 8,
> - .unaligned = false,
> - },
> -};
> -
> MemoryRegionSection *iotlb_to_section(CPUState *cpu,
> hwaddr index, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> {
> @@ -3047,8 +3012,6 @@ MemoryRegionSection *iotlb_to_section(CPUState *cpu,
>
> static void io_mem_init(void)
> {
> - memory_region_init_io(&io_mem_rom, NULL, &readonly_mem_ops,
> - NULL, NULL, UINT64_MAX);
> memory_region_init_io(&io_mem_unassigned, NULL, &unassigned_mem_ops, NULL,
> NULL, UINT64_MAX);
>
> @@ -3069,8 +3032,6 @@ AddressSpaceDispatch *address_space_dispatch_new(FlatView *fv)
> assert(n == PHYS_SECTION_UNASSIGNED);
> n = dummy_section(&d->map, fv, &io_mem_notdirty);
> assert(n == PHYS_SECTION_NOTDIRTY);
> - n = dummy_section(&d->map, fv, &io_mem_rom);
> - assert(n == PHYS_SECTION_ROM);
>
> d->phys_map = (PhysPageEntry) { .ptr = PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL, .skip = 1 };
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-23 22:59 [PATCH v4 00/16] Move rom and notdirty handling to cputlb Richard Henderson
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] exec: Use TARGET_PAGE_BITS_MIN for TLB flags Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 13:53 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] cputlb: Disable __always_inline__ without optimization Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 13:56 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] qemu/compiler.h: Add optimize_away Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 7:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-24 17:27 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 17:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-24 15:47 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] cputlb: Use optimize_away in load/store_helpers Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 7:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-24 15:47 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] cputlb: Split out load/store_memop Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 7:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-24 15:51 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] cputlb: Introduce TLB_BSWAP Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 18:25 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-25 17:36 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] exec: Adjust notdirty tracing Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 21:53 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] cputlb: Move ROM handling from I/O path to TLB path Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 0:16 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2019-09-25 6:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 16:01 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-25 17:01 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] cputlb: Move NOTDIRTY " Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 16:06 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] cputlb: Partially inline memory_region_section_get_iotlb Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 7:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:55 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 19:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 16:12 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] cputlb: Merge and move memory_notdirty_write_{prepare, complete} Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 8:04 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] cputlb: Merge and move memory_notdirty_write_{prepare,complete} David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 16:15 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 23:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] cputlb: Handle TLB_NOTDIRTY in probe_access Richard Henderson
2019-09-24 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 16:21 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 23:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] cputlb: Remove cpu->mem_io_vaddr Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 16:22 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 23:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] cputlb: Remove tb_invalidate_phys_page_range is_cpu_write_access Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 16:23 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 23:00 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] cputlb: Pass retaddr to tb_invalidate_phys_page_fast Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 16:28 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-23 23:00 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] cputlb: Pass retaddr to tb_check_watchpoint Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 16:30 ` Alex Bennée
2019-09-25 18:52 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] Move rom and notdirty handling to cputlb Mark Cave-Ayland
2019-09-25 18:54 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9th9qnz.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.