All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Subject: Re: `git status -u no` suppresses modified files too.
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 14:35:31 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87va1btaic.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208024800.GA11392@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:18:57PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> This broke my "is this clean?" sanity check and very much violates
>> the man page description.
>
> Wow, this one had me scratching my head for a minute. What you're
> describing here:
>
>>         $ git status -u no
>>         On branch guilt/repro
>
> ...seems horribly broken, and the behavior goes back to the beginnings
> of "-u". So I wondered how we would not have noticed for so long.
>
> But what is going on is quite subtle. The "-u" option takes an optional
> argument, and so must be used in its "stuck" form. I.e.,
>
>   git status -uno

Urgh, manual page even *says* this, and I missed it:

        It is optional: it
        defaults to all, and if specified, it must be stuck to the option (e.g.  -uno, but not -u
        no).

Note that optional arguments are fundamentally broken like this: you
should *never* add them to your programs.  If -u suddently wanted an
argument, a new option should have been added.

But despite that "well, I wouldn't start from here!" advice, I think
your patch seems really helpful.

Thanks for clue contribution! 
Rusty.

> does do what you expect. We cannot allow the separated form here,
> because that would conflict with another actual option, like:
>
>   git status -u --porcelain
>
> So why does it behave as it does? We accept "no" as its own pathspec
> argument, and thus we limit the status to that path. And that's why
> there's "nothing to commit"; there's nothing in that pathspec.
>
> This is a pretty horrible UI trap. Most of the time with pathspecs we
> require them to be on the right-hand side of a "--" unless the paths
> actually exist in the filesystem. But then, in most of those cases we're
> making sure they're not ambiguous between revisions and paths. So maybe
> it's overkill here. I dunno. But the patch below certainly makes what's
> going on in your case less subtle:
>
>   $ git status -u no
>   fatal: no: no such path in the working tree.
>   Use 'git <command> -- <path>...' to specify paths that do not exist locally.
>
> You do still have to figure out why it wasn't stuck to "-u", though.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
> index 2986553d5f..7177d7d82f 100644
> --- a/builtin/commit.c
> +++ b/builtin/commit.c
> @@ -1300,6 +1300,16 @@ static int git_status_config(const char *k, const char *v, void *cb)
>  	return git_diff_ui_config(k, v, NULL);
>  }
>  
> +static void verify_pathspec(const char *prefix, const char **argv)
> +{
> +	while (*argv) {
> +		const char *arg = *argv++;
> +		if (!strcmp(arg, "--"))
> +			return;
> +		verify_filename(prefix, arg, 0);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  int cmd_status(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  {
>  	static int no_renames = -1;
> @@ -1351,7 +1361,7 @@ int cmd_status(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	status_init_config(&s, git_status_config);
>  	argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix,
>  			     builtin_status_options,
> -			     builtin_status_usage, 0);
> +			     builtin_status_usage, PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH);
>  	finalize_colopts(&s.colopts, -1);
>  	finalize_deferred_config(&s);
>  
> @@ -1362,6 +1372,7 @@ int cmd_status(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	    s.show_untracked_files == SHOW_NO_UNTRACKED_FILES)
>  		die(_("Unsupported combination of ignored and untracked-files arguments"));
>  
> +	verify_pathspec(prefix, argv);
>  	parse_pathspec(&s.pathspec, 0,
>  		       PATHSPEC_PREFER_FULL,
>  		       prefix, argv);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-25  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-08  1:48 `git status -u no` suppresses modified files too Rusty Russell
2019-02-08  2:48 ` Jeff King
2019-02-23  4:05   ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2019-02-25  8:59     ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-03  1:22   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87va1btaic.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.