From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fo8CI-00030C-LI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:15:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fo8CD-0001F2-Nh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:15:22 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:44704 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fo8CD-0001ER-Iy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:15:17 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <20180808120334.10970-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20180808120334.10970-9-armbru@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:15:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eric Blake's message of "Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:57:38 -0500") Message-ID: <87va8il34c.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/56] check-qjson: Streamline escaped_string()'s test strings List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com Eric Blake writes: > On 08/08/2018 07:02 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Merge a few closely related test strings, and drop a few redundant >> ones. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- >> tests/check-qjson.c | 14 ++------------ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> > >> } test_cases[] = { >> - { "\\b", "\b" }, >> - { "\\f", "\f" }, >> - { "\\n", "\n" }, >> - { "\\r", "\r" }, >> - { "\\t", "\t" }, >> - { "/", "/" }, >> - { "\\/", "/", .skip = 1 }, >> - { "\\\\", "\\" }, >> - { "\\\"", "\"" }, >> - { "hello world \\\"embedded string\\\"", >> - "hello world \"embedded string\"" }, >> - { "hello world\\nwith new line", "hello world\nwith new line" }, >> + { "\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\\\\\\"", "\b\f\n\r\t\\\"" }, >> + { "\\/\\'", "/'", .skip = 1 }, > > Aha - this adds coverage of the escaped ' not present in 7/56. You're right. I'll move that part there. > Aha - this adds coverage of the escaped ' not present in 7/56. (Still > nothing about the unescaped versions of ' or " with correct quoting). > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Thanks!