From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXPWJ-0002ii-34 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 05:46:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXPWF-0005RK-6u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 05:46:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXPWF-0005Qd-0S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 05:46:35 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6F3180474 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:46:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <20180105103843.30526-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Fri, 5 Jan 2018 11:38:43 +0100") References: <20180105103843.30526-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:46:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87vaggoa65.fsf@secure.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-web PATCH] refine spectre blog post List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com Paolo Bonzini wrote: > People were confused about the level of protection provided by host kernel > updates (which do not exist yet, but I digress). They were also asking > whether it will be possible to live migrate from old to new QEMU and get > the fixes. Clarify both aspects. > > Suggested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert > Suggested-by: Juan Quintela > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Thanks, much better wording. Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela