From: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, broonie@kernel.org,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
deepa.kernel@gmail.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com, lucien xin <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mqueue: fix IPC namespace use-after-free
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vah2ftn8.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874lomhcwb.fsf@redhat.com> (Giuseppe Scrivano's message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:59:32 +0100")
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com> writes:
> The only issue I've seen with my version is that if I do:
>
> # unshare -im /bin/sh
> # mount -t mqueue mqueue /dev/mqueue
> # touch /dev/mqueue/foo
> # umount /dev/mqueue
> # mount -t mqueue mqueue /dev/mqueue
>
> then /dev/mqueue/foo doesn't exist at this point. Your patch does not
> have this problem and /dev/mqueue/foo is again accessible after the
> second mount.
although, how much is that of an issue? Is there any other way to delay
the cost of kern_mount_data()? Most containers have /dev/mqueue mounted
but it is not really going to be used.
Would it be possible somehow to postpone it until the first inode is
created?
Thanks,
Giuseppe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-19 10:14 [PATCH linux-next] mqueue: fix IPC namespace use-after-free Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 11:48 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 15:32 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 15:44 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 16:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-19 17:02 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 16:59 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-12-19 18:40 ` Giuseppe Scrivano [this message]
2017-12-19 20:14 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 21:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-12-19 22:40 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 23:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-12-21 19:19 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vah2ftn8.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=gscrivan@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.