From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1diNHX-0004pj-Tu for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:04:30 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: ath10k firmware-6.bin bug: Disconnections every 20 minutes on QCA6174 Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:03:55 +0000 Message-ID: <87valm2nbp.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <87lgmj7g75.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87ziaz60ce.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87valn5vhs.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87pobu4qer.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <878tii47sx.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: (Adrian Chadd's message of "Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:54:15 -0700") Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Kouroche Bouchiat , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Adrian Chadd writes: > I'd rather see the ones that are known-to-be-ok-to-ignore be ignored. Absolutely and that's what I meant. But I think there was a discussion before that I least one event was ok to ignore (I have forgotten the details already). -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k