From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zen.linaro.local ([81.128.185.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm711916wme.30.2017.07.21.02.44.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 02:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaro.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F36CA3E0127; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:44:45 +0100 (BST) References: <20170720150426.12393-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20170720150426.12393-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <1ff55ec6-b8e5-8696-7472-0ac22073ddf4@redhat.com> <87ziby6udk.fsf@linaro.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.2.50.3 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Peter Maydell Cc: Thomas Huth , Richard Henderson , qemu-arm , QEMU Developers , Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH for 2.11 03/23] softfloat3c: dos2unix all files In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:44:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87vamm6s4y.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUID: Imvy6U15gpS0 Peter Maydell writes: > On 21 July 2017 at 09:56, Alex Bennée wrote: >> One thing playing in my mind against moving to SoftFloat3c is the >> inscrutability of the upstream. It's nice there has been a new release >> with new features but there isn't a source repository or as far as I can >> tell a development list. It is basically as far as I can tell a one man >> project albeit backed by academic funding. > > I think https://github.com/ucb-bar/berkeley-softfloat-3 may > be official-ish, though it's hard to tell with github repos. Ohh good catch - it certainly looks as though it could be. I'll submit the compile fixes and see if it is a worthwhile path for feeding stuff upstream. If so maybe it would be worth considering the integration as a git submodule? > > thanks > -- PMM -- Alex Bennée