All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <87vamv2pj0.fsf@xmission.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 1933022..efd42ff 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
-Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:
+Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
 
 > On 07/13/2017 08:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
->> Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:
+>> Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
 >>
 >>> On 07/13/2017 01:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
 >>>
 >>>> My big question right now is can you implement Ted's suggested
->>>> restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo@... attribute ?
+>>>> restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo at ... attribute ?
 >>> We need to raw-list the xattrs and do the check before writing them. I am fairly sure this can be done.
 >>>
->>> So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo@uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?
+>>> So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo at uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?
 >>>
 >> The latter.
 >
@@ -33,3 +33,8 @@ make sense.  Could you explain that to me?
 Thank you.
 
 Eric
+
+--
+To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
+the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
+More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 723af65..db6f741 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -13,33 +13,24 @@
  "ref\09a3010e5-ca2b-5e7a-656b-fcc14f7bec4e@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\087h8yf7szd.fsf@xmission.com\0"
  "ref\065dbe654-0d99-03fa-c838-5a726b462826@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\065dbe654-0d99-03fa-c838-5a726b462826-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces\0"
+ "From\0ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 14 Jul 2017 07:04:19 -0500\0"
- "To\0Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>"
-  zohar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
-  containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org
-  linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org
- " lkp-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:\n"
+ "Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:\n"
  "\n"
  "> On 07/13/2017 08:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:\n"
- ">> Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:\n"
+ ">> Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">>> On 07/13/2017 01:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">>>> My big question right now is can you implement Ted's suggested\n"
- ">>>> restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo@... attribute ?\n"
+ ">>>> restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo at ... attribute ?\n"
  ">>> We need to raw-list the xattrs and do the check before writing them. I am fairly sure this can be done.\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo@uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?\n"
+ ">>> So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo at uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">> The latter.\n"
  ">\n"
@@ -62,6 +53,11 @@
  "\n"
  "Thank you.\n"
  "\n"
- Eric
+ "Eric\n"
+ "\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
+ "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
+ More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
-46a9aab1ef26fbd9734fb811d9be2a176323ef60cfbc1f519bb541178776bc2c
+77e524304169c2a8d5f3d3f908e9a8dfd74090c606b82f1ea7faaf7e68a43e58

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 1933022..f82859a 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
-Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:
+Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
 
 > On 07/13/2017 08:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
->> Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:
+>> Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
 >>
 >>> On 07/13/2017 01:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
 >>>
 >>>> My big question right now is can you implement Ted's suggested
->>>> restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo@... attribute ?
+>>>> restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo(a)... attribute ?
 >>> We need to raw-list the xattrs and do the check before writing them. I am fairly sure this can be done.
 >>>
->>> So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo@uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?
+>>> So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo(a)uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?
 >>>
 >> The latter.
 >
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 723af65..8570198 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -1,45 +1,22 @@
- "ref\01499785511-17192-1-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\01499785511-17192-2-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\087mv89iy7q.fsf@xmission.com\0"
- "ref\020170712170346.GA17974@mail.hallyn.com\0"
- "ref\0877ezdgsey.fsf@xmission.com\0"
- "ref\074664cc8-bc3e-75d6-5892-f8934404349f@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\020170713011554.xwmrgkzfwnibvgcu@thunk.org\0"
- "ref\087y3rscz9j.fsf@xmission.com\0"
- "ref\020170713164012.brj2flnkaaks2oci@thunk.org\0"
- "ref\087k23cb6os.fsf@xmission.com\0"
- "ref\0847ccb2a-30c0-a94c-df6f-091c8901eaa0@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\087bmoo8bxb.fsf@xmission.com\0"
- "ref\09a3010e5-ca2b-5e7a-656b-fcc14f7bec4e@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\087h8yf7szd.fsf@xmission.com\0"
  "ref\065dbe654-0d99-03fa-c838-5a726b462826@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\065dbe654-0d99-03fa-c838-5a726b462826-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)\0"
+ "From\0Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 14 Jul 2017 07:04:19 -0500\0"
- "To\0Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>"
-  zohar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
-  containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org
-  linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org
- " lkp-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org\0"
- "\00:1\0"
+ "To\0lkp@lists.01.org\0"
+ "\01:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:\n"
+ "Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:\n"
  "\n"
  "> On 07/13/2017 08:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:\n"
- ">> Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:\n"
+ ">> Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">>> On 07/13/2017 01:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">>>> My big question right now is can you implement Ted's suggested\n"
- ">>>> restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo@... attribute ?\n"
+ ">>>> restriction.  Only one security.foo or secuirty.foo(a)... attribute ?\n"
  ">>> We need to raw-list the xattrs and do the check before writing them. I am fairly sure this can be done.\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo@uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?\n"
+ ">>> So now you want to allow security.foo and one security.foo(a)uid=<> or just a single one security.foo(@[[:print:]]*)?\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">> The latter.\n"
  ">\n"
@@ -64,4 +41,4 @@
  "\n"
  Eric
 
-46a9aab1ef26fbd9734fb811d9be2a176323ef60cfbc1f519bb541178776bc2c
+3b212dcebb2c111497408f39f750c84f9ae8cd7cb51026f5f77f2ad83575a91e

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index 1933022..ee7d053 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:
+Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
 
 > On 07/13/2017 08:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
->> Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:
+>> Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
 >>
 >>> On 07/13/2017 01:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
 >>>
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 723af65..c07258c 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -13,25 +13,29 @@
  "ref\09a3010e5-ca2b-5e7a-656b-fcc14f7bec4e@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\087h8yf7szd.fsf@xmission.com\0"
  "ref\065dbe654-0d99-03fa-c838-5a726b462826@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\065dbe654-0d99-03fa-c838-5a726b462826-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)\0"
+ "From\0ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 14 Jul 2017 07:04:19 -0500\0"
- "To\0Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>"
-  zohar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
-  containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org
-  linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  casey-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org
- " lkp-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org\0"
+ "To\0Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>"
+  Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
+  containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
+  lkp@01.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
+  tycho@docker.com
+  James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
+  vgoyal@redhat.com
+  christian.brauner@mailbox.org
+  amir73il@gmail.com
+  linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
+ " casey@schaufler-ca.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:\n"
+ "Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:\n"
  "\n"
  "> On 07/13/2017 08:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:\n"
- ">> Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> writes:\n"
+ ">> Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">>> On 07/13/2017 01:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:\n"
  ">>>\n"
@@ -64,4 +68,4 @@
  "\n"
  Eric
 
-46a9aab1ef26fbd9734fb811d9be2a176323ef60cfbc1f519bb541178776bc2c
+306e7bb9d4a500e312a16134ce8a49fca09b9fc34fb70702062b44e5095cfb26

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.