Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QJSON: Use OBJECT_CHECK

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2015 14:43:19 +0200
> Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 07:05:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> >> Am 25.04.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
>> >> > The QJSON code used casts to (QJSON*) directly, instead of OBJECT_CHECK.
>> >> > There were even some functions using object_dynamic_cast() calls
>> >> > followed by assert(), which is exactly what OBJECT_CHECK does (by
>> >> > calling object_dynamic_cast_assert()).
>> >> 
>> >> Suggest s/OBJECT_CHECK/OBJECT_CHECK()/g everywhere for clarity.
>> >
>> > I assume it can be fixed during commit by whoever is going to queue it.
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> > 
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  qjson.c | 10 +++++-----
>> >> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >> 
>> >> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> >> 
>> >> Wasn't aware QJSON is using QOM - assuming this will go through some
>> >> QAPI/QMP tree.
>> >
>> > The only user of qjson.c right now is migration code. Should it go through
>> > the migration tree?
>> 
>> 
>> I will take it, but I trust your reviews-by O:-)
>
> I've already applied this one to the QMP tree.

I saw it later on the thread, I was about to say that all for you O:-)


>
>> 
>> >
>> > Also, why do we have two JSON writers in QEMU? And why do they have
>> > exactly the same name?
>> 
>> Alex?  I guess alex have this implementation when he did the code long
>> ago?
>> 
>> Later, Juan.
>>