From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YT3ik-0007WU-BI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 02:27:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YT3if-0006RM-2K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 02:27:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YT3ie-0006RD-R2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 02:27:48 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <54F45893.5080802@redhat.com> <54F4618D.1050205@redhat.com> <54F5B345.4010706@gmail.com> <54F5BDD5.5070706@redhat.com> <54F5CE1D.7050802@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 08:27:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Peter Maydell's message of "Wed, 4 Mar 2015 00:14:21 +0900") Message-ID: <87vbih2pea.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Delaying -rc0? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum , Paolo Bonzini , Kevin OConnor , Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel Peter Maydell writes: > On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >> In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that took >> a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet >> in master. > > You can view this as an argument against enormous pull requests > with nearly a hundred patches in them -- they're much more likely > to hit multiple issues in submission with minor things that need > fixing, simply because of their size... Yes. The current PCI pull request is clearly too big for its own good.