From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:34:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vbzxd473.fsf@natisbad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131112100126.GB23981@1wt.eu> (Willy Tarreau's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:01:26 +0100")
Hi,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:14:34AM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
>> Tests for the rgression were done w/ scp, and were hence limited by the
>> crypto (16MB/s using arcfour128). But I also did some tests w/ a simple
>> wget for a file served by Apache *before* the regression and I never got
>> more than 60MB/s from what I recall. Can you beat that?
>
> Yes, I finally picked my mirabox out of my bag for a quick test. It boots
> off 3.10.0-rc7 and I totally saturate one port (stable 988 Mbps) with even
> a single TCP stream.
Thanks for the feedback. That's interesting. What are you using for your tests
(wget, ...)?
> With two systems, one directly connected (dockstar) and the other one via
> a switch, I get 2*650 Mbps (a single TCP stream is enough on each).
>
> I'll have to re-run some tests using a more up to date kernel, but that
> will probably not be today though.
Can you give a pre-3.11.7 kernel a try if you find the time? I started
working on RN102 during 3.10-rc cycle but do not remember if I did the
first preformance tests on 3.10 or 3.11. And if you find more time,
3.11.7 would be nice too ;-)
Cheers,
a+
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
edumazet@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:34:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vbzxd473.fsf@natisbad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131112100126.GB23981@1wt.eu> (Willy Tarreau's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:01:26 +0100")
Hi,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:14:34AM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
>> Tests for the rgression were done w/ scp, and were hence limited by the
>> crypto (16MB/s using arcfour128). But I also did some tests w/ a simple
>> wget for a file served by Apache *before* the regression and I never got
>> more than 60MB/s from what I recall. Can you beat that?
>
> Yes, I finally picked my mirabox out of my bag for a quick test. It boots
> off 3.10.0-rc7 and I totally saturate one port (stable 988 Mbps) with even
> a single TCP stream.
Thanks for the feedback. That's interesting. What are you using for your tests
(wget, ...)?
> With two systems, one directly connected (dockstar) and the other one via
> a switch, I get 2*650 Mbps (a single TCP stream is enough on each).
>
> I'll have to re-run some tests using a more up to date kernel, but that
> will probably not be today though.
Can you give a pre-3.11.7 kernel a try if you find the time? I started
working on RN102 during 3.10-rc cycle but do not remember if I did the
first preformance tests on 3.10 or 3.11. And if you find more time,
3.11.7 would be nice too ;-)
Cheers,
a+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 121+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-10 13:53 [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-10 13:53 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 6:48 ` Cong Wang
2013-11-12 6:48 ` Cong Wang
2013-11-12 7:56 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 7:56 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 8:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 8:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 9:14 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 9:14 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 10:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 10:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 15:34 ` Arnaud Ebalard [this message]
2013-11-12 15:34 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-13 7:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-13 7:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 14:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 14:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-17 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 6:44 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-19 6:44 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-19 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 17:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 17:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 18:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 18:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 18:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 18:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 23:53 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-19 23:53 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 0:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 0:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 0:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 0:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 8:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-20 8:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-20 19:21 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 19:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:26 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 19:26 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:28 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:28 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 21:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 0:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 0:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 18:38 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s) Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 19:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-21 19:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-21 21:51 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG, REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+, 3.12: " Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 21:51 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: " Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:01 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask Rob Herring
2013-11-21 22:01 ` Rob Herring
2013-11-21 22:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 21:51 ` [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 21:51 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 21:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 21:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-21 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-21 22:55 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 22:55 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 23:23 ` Rick Jones
2013-11-21 23:23 ` Rick Jones
2013-11-20 17:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:52 ` David Miller
2013-11-20 18:52 ` David Miller
2013-11-20 17:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:22 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 19:22 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-18 10:09 ` David Laight
2013-11-18 10:09 ` David Laight
2013-11-18 10:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 10:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 10:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-18 10:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-18 10:44 ` Simon Guinot
2013-11-18 10:44 ` Simon Guinot
2013-11-18 16:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-11-18 16:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-11-18 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-18 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-18 10:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 10:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-11-18 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-11-12 14:39 ` [PATCH] tcp: tsq: restore minimal amount of queueing Eric Dumazet
2013-11-12 15:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-13 14:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 14:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 21:18 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-13 21:59 ` Holger Hoffstaette
2013-11-13 23:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 23:52 ` Holger Hoffstaette
2013-11-17 23:15 ` Francois Romieu
2013-11-18 16:26 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-11-18 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 22:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-14 21:26 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vbzxd473.fsf@natisbad.org \
--to=arno@natisbad.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.