All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] dma: mmp_pdma: add support for residue reporting
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:07:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vc2touhl.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20130825180615.GX6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk

Hi Russell,

Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> Even when there is a callback set, there's no requirement for the DMA
> engine driver to keep the descriptor around after it has been submitted -
> it is free to copy that data into whatever internal representation it
> requires and then discard the descriptor if it so wishes.

That means that a driver which wished to "resubmit" the descriptor has to
"rebuild it" again, no ?

I was under the impression that a descriptor had the guarantee to survive even
after completion. This comes from include/linux/dmaengine.h:168, in enum
dma_ctrl_flags comment :
 * @DMA_CTRL_ACK - if clear, the descriptor cannot be reused until the client
 *  acknowledges receipt, i.e. has has a chance to establish any dependency
 *  chains

The sentence "cannot be reused until" meant that after it could be reused.

And there are usecases for that, for example a video capture buffer. The source
for DMA is always the same (camera FIFO), the destination is always the same
(ie. the same scatter-gather). Why rebuild all the info to resubmit the same
descriptor ?

So is my understand incorrect, and in that case is there a way with dmaengine to
"resubmit" a descriptor, without going through the whole preparation ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-26  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-16 17:05 [PATCH v4 0/4] dma: pdma: cyclic, residue, DMA_PRIVATE Daniel Mack
2013-08-16 17:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dma: mmp_pdma: only complete one transaction from dma_do_tasklet() Daniel Mack
2013-08-20  2:27   ` Xiang Wang
2013-08-20  7:44     ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-25  1:15       ` Robert Jarzmik
2013-08-16 17:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] dma: mmp_pdma: add support for cyclic DMA descriptors Daniel Mack
2013-08-16 17:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] dma: mmp_pdma: add support for residue reporting Daniel Mack
2013-08-21 11:35   ` Xiang Wang
2013-08-21 11:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-08-21 12:03       ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-21 12:08         ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-08-25 16:11         ` Vinod Koul
2013-08-25 17:01           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-25 16:48             ` Vinod Koul
2013-08-25 18:06               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-26  6:07                 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2013-08-21 11:55     ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-16 17:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] dma: mmp_pdma: set DMA_PRIVATE Daniel Mack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vc2touhl.fsf@free.fr \
    --to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.