From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document push --no-verify Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 22:23:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc6arcf4.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> References: <7vli77j5nm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Aaron Schrab , To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 22 22:24:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UfFZx-0003lN-I2 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 22:24:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754726Ab3EVUYF (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 16:24:05 -0400 Received: from edge10.ethz.ch ([82.130.75.186]:33049 "EHLO edge10.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753849Ab3EVUYE (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 16:24:04 -0400 Received: from CAS10.d.ethz.ch (172.31.38.210) by edge10.ethz.ch (82.130.75.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Wed, 22 May 2013 22:23:58 +0200 Received: from linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net.ethz.ch (46.126.8.85) by cas10.d.ethz.ch (172.31.38.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Wed, 22 May 2013 22:24:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7vli77j5nm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 22 May 2013 10:17:17 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [46.126.8.85] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Thomas Rast writes: > >> ec55559 (push: Add support for pre-push hooks, 2013-01-13) forgot to >> add a note to git-push(1) about the new --no-verify option. > > Does it take --verify option (that may well be the default) so that > somebody with > > [alias] put = push --no-verify > > can say "git put --verify args..."? Yes. Doesn't parse-options implicitly do the correct negation for all boolean options, even those that are declared in their negative form? -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch