From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-spec: tweak wording for console control vq Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:18:11 +0930 Message-ID: <87vc6cygk4.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20130520122051.GA11581@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130520122051.GA11581@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > control vq is only used if feature bit is > negotiated - it's not enough that device supports > it. Clarify this in the spec. Thanks, applied. Cheers, Rusty. > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > virtio-spec.lyx | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virtio-spec.lyx b/virtio-spec.lyx > index 921388b..3ef96a9 100644 > --- a/virtio-spec.lyx > +++ b/virtio-spec.lyx > @@ -6833,8 +6833,13 @@ VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_SIZE > > \begin_layout Description > VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT(1) Device has support for multiple ports; configurati > -on fields nr_ports and max_nr_ports are valid and control virtqueues will > - be used. > +on fields nr_ports and max_nr_ports are valid > +\change_inserted 1986246365 1347188404 > +; if this bit is negotiated, > +\change_deleted 1986246365 1347188406 > + and > +\change_unchanged > + control virtqueues will be used. > \change_inserted 1112500848 1368412890 > > \end_layout > -- > MST