From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: GnuPG commit signature verification ignores GPG's status-fd and status-file options Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:22:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc7vlodt.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> References: <5164027C.4020007@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: To: Not Sure X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 09 17:23:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPaNy-00043Z-3U for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:23:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765434Ab3DIPW5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:22:57 -0400 Received: from edge10.ethz.ch ([82.130.75.186]:31575 "EHLO edge10.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761860Ab3DIPW5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:22:57 -0400 Received: from CAS21.d.ethz.ch (172.31.51.111) by edge10.ethz.ch (82.130.75.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:22:52 +0200 Received: from linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net.ethz.ch (129.132.153.233) by CAS21.d.ethz.ch (172.31.51.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:22:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5164027C.4020007@googlemail.com> (Not Sure's message of "Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:58:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [129.132.153.233] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Not Sure writes: > Starting with the newest git version 1.8.2.1, the signature checking [...] > Missing from output is the machine parsable GPG information: > > [GNUPG:] SIG_ID sorvifhoerui/asidunb 2013-04-09 23947273 > [GNUPG:] GOODSIG 433811111111111324 User > [GNUPG:] VALIDSIG ddddddddddddddddddfsjidjfv 2013-04-09 aoidfjidh0 0 4 0 > 1 2 00 oshidvoo444444ddddddddd > [GNUPG:] TRUST_ULTIMATE I suspect that's because since b60b756 (gpg-interface: check good signature in a reliable way, 2013-02-14), Git parses the above output. Also, in e290c4b (pretty printing: extend %G? to include 'N' and 'U', 2013-03-31) which is currently in master, this was fixed: > Note: The git-log format specifiers %GG, %G?, %GK, ... do not provide > enough information Is anything else missing? -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch