From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfqwB-0001oQ-D4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:45:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfqw9-0006Px-My for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:45:19 -0500 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <87d2yq63gc.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (Anthony Liguori's message of "Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:55:31 -0600") References: <1354581520-25993-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <87d2yq63gc.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:44:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87vccica88.fsf@elfo.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [0/2] Migration bugfixes that were forgotten for 1.3 Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson Anthony Liguori wrote: > David Gibson writes: > >> I've sent these before, and reminded several times about the first one >> at least, but they still slipped through the cracks and didn't make it >> into 1.3. The first at least should go into the stable tree - it is a >> very simple bugfix for a serious bug (qemu and possibly also guest >> memory corruption). > > Juan, > > Are you going to pick these up or do you want me to? Picking them. Thanks, Juan.