From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/10] OMAP: GPIO: cleanup suspend and resume functions Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:08:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87vcx67jx9.fsf@ti.com> References: <1305546104-1511-1-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> <1305546104-1511-8-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.71]:38262 "EHLO na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932238Ab1ESQIL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2011 12:08:11 -0400 Received: by mail-wy0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 11so2692456wyi.40 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:08:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1305546104-1511-8-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Mon, 16 May 2011 17:11:41 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tarun Kanti DebBarma Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Charulatha V , Santosh Shilimkar , Tony Lindgren Tarun Kanti DebBarma writes: > Since wake_status, wake_clear, wake_set is common for all banks on a given > OMAP version it is enough to get their values once during probe(). > Also, register offsets are already initialzed according to OMAP versions > during device registration. We no longer need these explicit checks. > > Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma Great! Kevin