From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BRGkY-0001Vu-NQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:36:14 -0400
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BRGk2-0001NS-43
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:36:13 -0400
Received: from [195.122.192.2] (helo=janik.cz)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BRGk1-0001My-HU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:35:41 -0400
From: Pavel@Janik.cz (=?iso-8859-2?q?Pavel_Jan=EDk?=)
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:35:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87vfip5xig.fsf@Janik.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Debugging IRQ latency
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

hw/i8259.c contains (when DEBUG_ is turned on):

           (double)(cpu_get_ticks() - irq_time[irq]) * 1000000.0 / ticks_=
per_sec);

but cpu_get_ticks is defined as static in vl.c:

static inline int64_t cpu_get_ticks(void)

Thus you can't debug IRQ latency.
--=20
Pavel Jan=EDk

Proving me wrong is always a good sport ;)
                  -- Linus Torvalds in linux-kernel