From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Wake Liu <wakel@google.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdso: Define NSEC_PER_SEC as 64-bit to prevent overflow
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 10:03:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wm7bbo3c.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOcRiAFzN61FE=By1ANB3aK4PKVTBQAzrCcfoHfHwMX7Qn8wYA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 09 2025 at 17:49, Wake Liu wrote:
Please do not top post and trim your replies.
> CLOCK_REALTIME ABSTIME PERIODIC timer fired early: 1 : [FAILED]
> Looks like there is some integer overflow on 32 bit builds in the
> timespec_sub function:
>
> long long timespec_sub(struct timespec a, struct timespec b)
That's in selftests and not in the kernel VDSO code.
Can you please be precise with your subject and changelog? You claimed:
"This can lead to incorrect time calculations within the VDSO"
No, it can't not because the VDSO does not use it that way.
> {
> long long ret = NSEC_PER_SEC * b.tv_sec + b.tv_nsec;
>
> ret -= NSEC_PER_SEC * a.tv_sec + a.tv_nsec;
> return ret;
> }
>
> on 32 bit builds NSEC_PER_SEC and b.tv_sec are only 32 bit values
> which I'm guessing is causing the overflow.
Guessing is not a valid technical problem solving approach.
> NSEC_PER_SEC is defined as 1000000000L but if we change this to
> 1000000000LL then the test starts passing.
Yes, that function bogus on 32bit.
There are at least ten different ways to implement this function 32-bit
safe, but you picked the worst option of all, which breaks the kernel
build as you got told by 0-day.
I'm sure you can figure out how to ensure that the multiplication is
actually expanding to 64-bit or use some other approach to calculate
that delta.
And please make that an inline function and put it into a header file in
the timer selftest directory, and replace _all_ copies of it in the
various timer tests.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-10 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 16:21 [PATCH] vdso: Define NSEC_PER_SEC as 64-bit to prevent overflow Wake Liu
2025-08-06 8:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-06 8:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-09 9:49 ` Wake Liu
2025-08-10 8:03 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-08-10 8:28 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-09-15 19:19 ` [PATCH v2] selftests/timers: Consolidate and fix 32-bit overflow in timespec_sub Wake Liu
2025-09-21 7:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-01-07 23:19 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-06 20:28 ` [PATCH] vdso: Define NSEC_PER_SEC as 64-bit to prevent overflow kernel test robot
2025-08-07 7:37 ` kernel test robot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-05 16:20 Wake Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wm7bbo3c.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=wakel@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.