From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61051233158; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 09:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753779796; cv=none; b=VS7xOMwqXci0XJQ3QFrUVwL8qpu0K7y7Z0/PWWy9hVtfpUX0XND2RhtPZ9Qyb7QLGB9bJNgVuYyjyDobdE8F1EfYWlw4Ib1/l5qq1EDr6m7xPTuOykH1hV2m/6FhOnHiINYBT65nKt2mzFrEvUQA1GjXuvvXbmqI5bRmjwpAcZg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753779796; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bXCJAuDlkQdamYA9BqBAhVJZuWsOlCjd4WSRFdakxVk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=a994fS08zjk4g+u+7LaTourOkWovI7V1pivOvc3eUVyu37YCQ0vZzDcS/tiHndQs4oEWBSz7pa9i3YCbAIth29PDdyd+cIe/MQtylm4RNJgBE2YiaRvh9z+iLG4fPRPdExv9ZjjJjHnzj6kYMIsOKSj4l9RRe+DURQIJ+Wihrt4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=2Hr6MpVw; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=pijgSKhY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="2Hr6MpVw"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="pijgSKhY" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1753779791; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=PP3lDhonAPoglORoTsV090gIft5h7SGt4dIcfcgV8uI=; b=2Hr6MpVwHFWwaKrngalfnpCQ4HzUDdYIlIOxDuQJCZBh6qLa9VTPkYI7Jrb77Wf66NY/yL YQhyx8vpNFBMlZgk/aWhRWZ6hy1SxYC4nAHkNLMgL3yIMSjkMQk6RcYaxE9ebobK7y4FjM l8AM9+vW5KnlrxOwgAxMxSUKRE2evoIQ/Wb05gsbZBNvn3hy+uqWSOwfl8qjfSM+S8ZbzB KT33Wc24Q5scMzY5uqTEgfyM1Kc5bNoroVL7SO+8p0/rGfobb15ZGDuAT9nBNP3qCeBmNE 9LIryvt11WudvW5NSQgcK/0iUeQ5izcezVK2Fg7EuXAZYQXd2EhVuPufTkY4DQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1753779791; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=PP3lDhonAPoglORoTsV090gIft5h7SGt4dIcfcgV8uI=; b=pijgSKhYcXOFtir6yQ6gsyjIJuGRQAym2pzE6D0rJWqcfO873xN2g5rs2TAo7sRLyUaGkq kBnVOKa/cAciYvDA== To: Daniel Lezcano , Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Donghoon Yu , Youngmin Nam , John Stultz , Will McVicker , x86@kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [tip: timers/clocksource] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Don't register as a sched_clock on arm64 In-Reply-To: <87qzxznzjp.ffs@tglx> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:03:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87wm7rjrn5.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 10:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 09:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> just a gentle ping for the question below about dropping the two patches. >> >> On 25/07/2025 15:15, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> >> [ ... ] >> >>>> So I got no answer for this question, but I suppose my assumption is >>>> correct - so I've rebased the tip:timers/clocksource commits to fix the >>>> misattribution and a number of other problems, and also fixed various >>>> typos, spelling mistakes and inconsistencies in the changelogs while at >>>> it. Let me know if I got something wrong. >>> >>> If the rebase is possible, I suggest to take the opportunity to remove >>> the following patches: >>> >>> commit 5d86e479193b - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Add module support >>> commit 7e477e9c4eb4 - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Fix section >>> mismatch from the module conversion >>> >>> Because of: >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725090349.87730-2- >>> krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ >>> >>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/bccb77b9-7cdc-4965- >>> aa05-05836466f81f@app.fastmail.com/ > > Grrr. > > I've already sent the pull request for the pile. Let me ask Linus not to > pull and I revert them on top. That requires to revert 2798e90b4e09 ("arm64: exynos: Drop select CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT") as well, no? Thanks, tglx