All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
To: eugene.loh@oracle.com
Cc: dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com, dtrace@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] Sync up the version numbers
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:51:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wm805whd.fsf@esperi.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625060305.15707-2-eugene.loh@oracle.com> (eugene loh's message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2025 02:03:02 -0400")

On 25 Jun 2025, eugene loh verbalised:

> From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
>
> DTrace has many version numbers -- e.g., for the release, packaging,
> and API.
>
> In reality, the variations in numbering have become nearly meaningless:

Tell me about it :(

> - Packaging numbers -- like the Version in the dtrace*spec RPM spec
>   file and the VERSION in GNUmakefile -- have basically been tracking
>   the DTrace release since 2.0 anyway.
>
> - Stability attributes for idents are haphazard.  Generally, they
>   are 1.0 (or sometimes other 1.x), and all the BPFs are 2.0.  While
>   this is generally accurate, it is not exactly robust, and idents
>   are sometimes introduced or modified without careful regard to
>   the version number.  Further, the stability of user D scripts is
>   likely to depend more on kernel variations -- e.g., the contents of
>   available_filter_functions -- than on D changes.
>
> - Version number updates are susceptible to mistakes, and so there
>   have been version mismatches.
>
> Bring the version numbers into sync for 2.0.3.  Clean up the descriptions
> in dt_version.h.

So... this means all the ident version numbers change to 2? I doubt it :)
but at least we *have* 2.0.[23] stability-related version numbers now.

Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>

modulo the tiny nit below.

> Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
> ---
>  GNUmakefile                                  |  5 +-
>  dtrace.spec                                  |  1 +
>  libdtrace/dt_open.c                          |  4 ++
>  libdtrace/dt_version.h                       | 54 ++++++++++++--------
>  test/unittest/dtrace-util/tst.APIVersion.r   |  2 +-
>  test/unittest/dtrace-util/tst.APIVersion.r.p |  6 +++
>  test/unittest/options/tst.version.r          |  2 +-
>  test/unittest/options/tst.version.sh         |  4 +-
>  8 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 test/unittest/dtrace-util/tst.APIVersion.r.p
>
> diff --git a/GNUmakefile b/GNUmakefile
> index d1e18bb1b..00269785b 100644
> --- a/GNUmakefile
> +++ b/GNUmakefile
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  # Build files in subdirectories are included by this file.
>  #
>  # Oracle Linux DTrace.
> -# Copyright (c) 2011, 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
> +# Copyright (c) 2011, 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
>  # Licensed under the Universal Permissive License v 1.0 as shown at
>  # http://oss.oracle.com/licenses/upl.
>  
> @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
>  SHELL = /bin/bash
>  
>  PROJECT := dtrace
> -VERSION := 2.0.1
> +# When updating version, see comments in dt_version.h.
> +VERSION := 2.0.3

Oh dear :( this one isn't invisible to users...

> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_version.h b/libdtrace/dt_version.h
> index 0f47ea70d..5cfcab69a 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dt_version.h
> +++ b/libdtrace/dt_version.h
> @@ -37,32 +37,28 @@ extern "C" {
>   *
>   * These #defines are used in identifier tables to fill in the version fields
>   * associated with each identifier.  The DT_VERS_* macros declare the encoded
> - * integer values of all versions used so far.  DT_VERS_STRING must be an ASCII
> - * string that contains the latest version within it along with any suffixes
> - * (e.g. Beta).  You must update DT_VERS_STRING when adding a new version,
> - * and then add the new version to the _dtrace_versions[] array declared in
> - * dt_open.c.
> + * integer values of all versions used so far.
>   *
> - * Refer to the Solaris Dynamic Tracing Guide Versioning chapter for an
> - * explanation of these DTrace features and their values.
> + * The major number should be incremented when a fundamental change has been
> + * made that would affect all consumers, and would reflect sweeping changes
> + * to DTrace or the D language.
> + *
> + * The minor number should be incremented when a change is introduced that
> + * could break scripts that had previously worked;  for example, adding a
> + * new built-in variable could break a script which was already using that
> + * identifier.
> + *
> + * The micro number should be changed when introducing functionality changes
> + * or major bug fixes that do not affect backward compatibility -- this is
> + * merely to make capabilities easily determined from the version number.
> + *
> + * Minor bugs do not require any modification to the version number.

Nice general rules! Now we just have to follow them :)

> + * When the version number is updated, the following must be kept in sync:
> + *
> + *   libdtrace/dt_version.h    DT_VERS_STRING, an ASCII string that contains
> + *                             the latest version within it along with any
> + *                             suffixes (e.g. Beta)
> + *
> + *   libdtrace/dt_open.c       _dtrace_versions[]
> + *
> + *   dtrace.spec               Version
> + *
> + *   libdtrace/Build           libdtrace_VERSION
> + *
> + *   GNUmakefile               VERSION

I don't think that's quite true -- in particular, libdtrace_VERSION
should only be bumped if it experiences incompatible API or ABI changes,
whether or not DTrace itself has seen e.g. major language changes (which
is why libdtrace_VERSION is not simply $(VERSION) already).

-- 
NULL && (void)

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-22 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25  6:03 [PATCH v2] Optimize USDT discovery a little eugene.loh
2025-06-25  6:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Sync up the version numbers eugene.loh
2025-07-22 10:51   ` Nick Alcock [this message]
2025-06-25  6:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] test: Add test for predefined preprocessor definitions eugene.loh
2025-06-25  6:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Extend the USDT bit mask to multiple words eugene.loh
2025-07-22 12:34   ` Nick Alcock
2025-07-23  0:47     ` Eugene Loh
2025-06-25  6:03 ` [PATCH] test: Extend timeout for many-pids test eugene.loh
2025-07-22 12:44   ` Nick Alcock
2025-07-22 10:45 ` [PATCH v2] Optimize USDT discovery a little Nick Alcock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wm805whd.fsf@esperi.org.uk \
    --to=nick.alcock@oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.