From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp (mail.parknet.co.jp [210.171.160.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3DAF226CF4 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=210.171.160.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750335260; cv=none; b=XgVPHsQ3d6WpNzqappcaAi5HEmtYRsavRhTTA6WRl4KQqUEy2kZaTwG+wRelG8DQ+jSA+T64vBDjWJXaw/mNiflN/YauWHJcDb9zpk0/JvgZKqkpxNS/t9HEAD0DWsG0Z+6PIfAnt8UuFrq7YgtePT5ppLtgy7FIADFPSRd2LBc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750335260; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z1KJJSa1l3moVKzdHD3D1k/OgYn693KW6aD1V306JsI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pG/V6q9S/Z/nDagFC1fzeJzM1wPskfE2neA3nY98HX7VkqH47O5cuLQHp1f8xAvA+frtWStTtYId/k58FS/11u1pPywWU4BCgsyomRKMAhecIomnQOG96hUZb8BdC3Dae+gz39Q7+yeDjjMb7npO2K0XrFCX0lGhKH/NqfSUcQ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mail.parknet.co.jp; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=parknet.co.jp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=parknet.co.jp header.i=@parknet.co.jp header.b=3FC4VMVT; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=parknet.co.jp header.i=@parknet.co.jp header.b=0gYobxAE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=210.171.160.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mail.parknet.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=parknet.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=parknet.co.jp header.i=@parknet.co.jp header.b="3FC4VMVT"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=parknet.co.jp header.i=@parknet.co.jp header.b="0gYobxAE" Received: from ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (server.parknet.ne.jp [210.171.168.39]) by mail.parknet.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3534A26F75D7; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:04:35 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parknet.co.jp; s=20250114; t=1750334675; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BM2yR5qWGRQEnE8Sije5dPIwlklCCQFy2vXK5ZpL7i0=; b=3FC4VMVTDDq3Bkz/2yv3dnkZlyzaCmhqyB+9idt0+9dV9cGKpfpnlkcee/i3yHWAVa99vW 8hyVVA3V69GBt/Qvm/bjipRskjfBlWNQ9+wHmLGogalxNVEcmRhejP1Bbe/YllPEaJEtjF vGVc24RhybGNzX8H1NbAzaH2gb2zmiMntH/WTAvS0Hrx7Pg2VGgJQShLtJHdcLRzppEQAK fBaIimi37q1HTZRtgX29YOmsJJxgzuraIwhaKYVWWiK50kiM2ejVmQdtFNVo2JUpP/kuAz Uc46BaF0ruOJU57qaw7ptMFOMk5ztn0S2QXhkKfoaQKBbVAD+bECasKU5+tyow== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parknet.co.jp; s=20250114-ed25519; t=1750334675; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BM2yR5qWGRQEnE8Sije5dPIwlklCCQFy2vXK5ZpL7i0=; b=0gYobxAE3jl/0WhatEPIFOb/CfK/LdgUHdnNtO/E6gMpX8wuKRkbq9fqlQDVC4xs0NcidL 2pYaIsqh7JeZ4/AA== Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@devron.myhome.or.jp [192.168.0.3]) by ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6) with ESMTPS id 55JC4XSG354955 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:04:34 +0900 Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6) with ESMTPS id 55JC4XWO140334 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:04:33 +0900 Received: (from hirofumi@localhost) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 55JC4Xjq140333; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:04:33 +0900 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Li Chen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: fat: Prevent fsfuzzer from dominating the console In-Reply-To: <20250619113809.274808-1-me@linux.beauty> References: <20250619113809.274808-1-me@linux.beauty> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:04:33 +0900 Message-ID: <87wm98aqem.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Li Chen writes: > Signed-off-by: Li Chen > Reviewed-by: Bin Lai > --- > fs/fat/misc.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fat/misc.c b/fs/fat/misc.c > index c7a2d27120bab..75c2b59fbd532 100644 > --- a/fs/fat/misc.c > +++ b/fs/fat/misc.c > @@ -23,8 +23,10 @@ void __fat_fs_error(struct super_block *sb, int report, const char *fmt, ...) > struct fat_mount_options *opts = &MSDOS_SB(sb)->options; > va_list args; > struct va_format vaf; > + static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(fat_err_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, > + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST); > > - if (report) { > + if (report && __ratelimit(&fat_err_rs)) { > va_start(args, fmt); > vaf.fmt = fmt; > vaf.va = &args; Why didn't use fat_fs_error_ratelimit()? Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi