From: Axel Forsman <axfo@kvaser.com>
To: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>,
Jimmy Assarsson <extja@kvaser.com>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: kvaser_pciefd: refine error prone echo_skb_max handling logic
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 13:32:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wma1nf7c.fsf@kvaser.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250528091038.4264-1-pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Thanks for finding and fixing this bug.
Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru> writes:
> Actually the trick with rounding up allows to calculate seq numbers
> efficiently, avoiding a more consuming 'mod' operation used in the
> current patch.
Indeed, that was the intention.
> So another approach to fix the problem would be to precompute the rounded
> up value of echo_skb_max and pass it to alloc_candev() making the size of
> the underlying echo_skb[] sufficient.
I believe that is preferable---if memory usage is a concern
KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT could be lowered by one.
Something like the following:
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
index f6921368cd14..0071a51ce2c1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int kvaser_pciefd_setup_can_ctrls(struct kvaser_pciefd *pcie)
u32 status, tx_nr_packets_max;
netdev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct kvaser_pciefd_can),
- KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT);
+ roundup_pow_of_two(KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT));
if (!netdev)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -995,7 +995,6 @@ static int kvaser_pciefd_setup_can_ctrls(struct kvaser_pciefd *pcie)
can->tx_max_count = min(KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT, tx_nr_packets_max - 1);
can->can.clock.freq = pcie->freq;
- can->can.echo_skb_max = roundup_pow_of_two(can->tx_max_count);
spin_lock_init(&can->lock);
can->can.bittiming_const = &kvaser_pciefd_bittiming_const;
/Axel Forsman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-28 9:10 [PATCH] can: kvaser_pciefd: refine error prone echo_skb_max handling logic Fedor Pchelkin
2025-05-28 11:32 ` Axel Forsman [this message]
2025-05-28 19:00 ` Fedor Pchelkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wma1nf7c.fsf@kvaser.com \
--to=axfo@kvaser.com \
--cc=extja@kvaser.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pchelkin@ispras.ru \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.