All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:59:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmdw1vu2.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211104857.3501566-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>

On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Lets use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state. This also

*Let's

> helps elimanate drm_i915_private dependency from i915_shared_dplls_info
> in display_debug_fs.

There's no display_debug_fs...

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c     |  8 ++++----
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c |  3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c    | 16 ++++++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h    |  4 ++--
>  5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
> index ecd0d9853c60..599ddce96371 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ void intel_crtc_state_dump(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>  			   struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			   const char *context)
>  {
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(pipe_config);
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>  	const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
> @@ -340,7 +341,7 @@ void intel_crtc_state_dump(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>  		   pipe_config->ips_enabled, pipe_config->double_wide,
>  		   pipe_config->has_drrs);
>  
> -	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(i915, &p, &pipe_config->dpll_hw_state);
> +	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(display, &p, &pipe_config->dpll_hw_state);
>  
>  	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
>  		drm_printf(&p, "cgm_mode: 0x%x gamma_mode: 0x%x gamma_enable: %d csc_enable: %d\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 9f8a8c94cf4c..5f4b1d8eed3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -5348,14 +5348,14 @@ pipe_config_pll_mismatch(struct drm_printer *p, bool fastset,
>  			 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *a,
>  			 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *b)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc);
>  
>  	pipe_config_mismatch(p, fastset, crtc, name, " "); /* stupid -Werror=format-zero-length */
>  
>  	drm_printf(p, "expected:\n");
> -	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(i915, p, a);
> +	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(display, p, a);
>  	drm_printf(p, "found:\n");
> -	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(i915, p, b);
> +	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(display, p, b);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -5495,7 +5495,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_PLL(name) do { \
> -	if (!intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(dev_priv, &current_config->name, \
> +	if (!intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(display, &current_config->name, \
>  					 &pipe_config->name)) { \
>  		pipe_config_pll_mismatch(&p, fastset, crtc, __stringify(name), \
>  					 &current_config->name, \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index 87e6f4000101..970b8078db8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -630,7 +630,6 @@ static int i915_display_capabilities(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  
>  static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
>  	struct intel_display *display = node_to_intel_display(m->private);
>  	struct drm_printer p = drm_seq_file_printer(m);
>  	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> @@ -649,7 +648,7 @@ static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  			   pll->state.pipe_mask, pll->active_mask,
>  			   str_yes_no(pll->on));
>  		drm_printf(&p, " tracked hardware state:\n");
> -		intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(dev_priv, &p, &pll->state.hw_state);
> +		intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(display, &p, &pll->state.hw_state);
>  	}
>  	drm_modeset_unlock_all(display->drm);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 171d16e91c61..ee4e263ce999 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -4592,18 +4592,18 @@ void intel_dpll_sanitize_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  
>  /**
>   * intel_dpll_dump_hw_state - dump hw_state
> - * @i915: i915 drm device
> + * @display: intel_display structure
>   * @p: where to print the state to
>   * @dpll_hw_state: hw state to be dumped
>   *
>   * Dumo out the relevant values in @dpll_hw_state.
>   */
> -void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
>  			      struct drm_printer *p,
>  			      const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
>  {
> -	if (i915->display.dpll.mgr) {
> -		i915->display.dpll.mgr->dump_hw_state(p, dpll_hw_state);
> +	if (display->dpll.mgr) {
> +		display->dpll.mgr->dump_hw_state(p, dpll_hw_state);
>  	} else {
>  		/* fallback for platforms that don't use the shared dpll
>  		 * infrastructure
> @@ -4614,7 +4614,7 @@ void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  
>  /**
>   * intel_dpll_compare_hw_state - compare the two states
> - * @i915: i915 drm device
> + * @display: intel_display structure
>   * @a: first DPLL hw state
>   * @b: second DPLL hw state
>   *
> @@ -4622,12 +4622,12 @@ void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>   *
>   * Returns: true if the states are equal, false if the differ
>   */
> -bool intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +bool intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
>  				 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *a,
>  				 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *b)
>  {
> -	if (i915->display.dpll.mgr) {
> -		return i915->display.dpll.mgr->compare_hw_state(a, b);
> +	if (display->dpll.mgr) {
> +		return display->dpll.mgr->compare_hw_state(a, b);
>  	} else {
>  		/* fallback for platforms that don't use the shared dpll
>  		 * infrastructure
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> index 382bdf8f0b65..42379494f347 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> @@ -427,10 +427,10 @@ void intel_dpll_update_ref_clks(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>  void intel_dpll_readout_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>  void intel_dpll_sanitize_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>  
> -void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
>  			      struct drm_printer *p,
>  			      const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
> -bool intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +bool intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
>  				 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *a,
>  				 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *b);
>  enum intel_dpll_id icl_tc_port_to_pll_id(enum tc_port tc_port);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-11 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-11 10:48 [PATCH 0/9] drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/display_debug_fs: Use intel_display wherever possible Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:51   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 12:52   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/display_debug_fs: Prefer using display->platform Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:53   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dpll: Change param to intel_display in for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:56   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:59   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display possible in shared_dpll_mgr hooks Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:10   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for asserting pll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:12   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for update_refclk hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:12   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dpll: Accept intel_display as argument for shared_dpll_init Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:14   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 14:23     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-11 16:57       ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-12  7:35         ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dpll: Replace all other leftover drm_i915_private Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:17   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 11:50 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-11 11:51 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-11 11:52 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:10 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:11 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:31 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-11 13:45 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-11 16:23 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-11 20:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-02-12  9:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup Kandpal, Suraj
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-10 12:39 Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state Suraj Kandpal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wmdw1vu2.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.