All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Brian Cain <quic_bcain@quicinc.com>
Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,  <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/tcg/multiarch: Define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:12:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmjbg2th.fsf@draig.linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0298a6cc-2c75-4cb9-8f9c-146c0173fc31@quicinc.com> (Brian Cain's message of "Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:45:38 -0500")

Brian Cain <quic_bcain@quicinc.com> writes:

> On 9/6/2024 9:39 PM, Brian Cain wrote:
>> With newer clang builds (19.x), there's a warning for implicit function
>> declarations and it rejects linux-test.c.
>>
>> glibc/musl's readdir64() declaration in dirent is guarded by
>> _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE, so we'll define it to fix the warning.
>>
>>        BUILD   hexagon-linux-user guest-tests
>>      /local/mnt/workspace/upstream/toolchain_for_hexagon/qemu/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux/linux-test.c:189:14: error: call to undeclared function 'readdir64'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>        189 |         de = readdir64(dir);
>>            |              ^
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/tcg/multiarch/linux/linux-test.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux/linux-test.c b/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux/linux-test.c
>> index 64f57cb287..4e0e862ad9 100644
>> --- a/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux/linux-test.c
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux/linux-test.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>    *  along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>    */
>>   #define _GNU_SOURCE
>> +#define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
>>   #include <stdarg.h>
>>   #include <stdlib.h>
>>   #include <stdio.h>
>
>
> Alex -- what do you think about this one?

Actually scratch that, this is a 32 compat hack:

  1f442da51e (tests/tcg/multiarch: fix 32bit linux-test on 64bit host)

Is the __USE_LARGEFILE64 symbol in the hexagon headers?

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-16 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-07  2:39 [PATCH] tests/tcg/multiarch: Define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE Brian Cain
2024-09-16 12:45 ` Brian Cain
2024-09-16 13:08   ` Alex Bennée
2024-09-16 13:12   ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2024-09-16 14:23     ` Brian Cain
2024-09-16 15:47       ` Alex Bennée
2024-09-16 16:05         ` Brian Cain
2024-09-16 16:31           ` Brian Cain
2024-09-19 13:48             ` Brian Cain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wmjbg2th.fsf@draig.linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=bcain@quicinc.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quic_bcain@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.