From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: "Fiona Ebner" <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
"Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] hw/pci: Disable PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK register for machine type < 8.0
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 13:33:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn15dgbs.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c3a4f60-b3ab-7c38-27c0-3f8f2caaeae4@tls.msk.ru> (Michael Tokarev's message of "Thu, 18 May 2023 10:34:36 +0300")
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
> 11.05.2023 11:40, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> wrote:
> ...
>>> Closes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1576
>>>
>>> AFAICT, this breaks (forward) migration from 8.0 to 8.0 + this patch
>>> when using machine type <= 7.2. That is because after this patch, when
>>> using machine type <= 7.2, the wmask for the register is not set and
>>> when 8.0 sends a nonzero value for the register, the error condition in
>>> get_pci_config_device() will trigger again.
>> I think that works correctly.
>> See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-05/msg02733.html
>> What we have (before this patch) (using abbrevs as in the doc
>> before)
>> Current state:
>> (1) qemu-8.0 -M pc-8.0 -> qemu-8.0 -M pc-8.0 works
>> not affected by the patch
>> (2) qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 -> qemu-8.0 -M pc-8.0 works
>> works well because 7.2 don't change that field
>> (3) qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 -> qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 fails
>> With the patch we fixed 3, so once it is in stable, 1 and 2 continue
>> as
>> usual and for (3) we will have:
>> (3) qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 -> qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 works
>> If what you mean is that:
>> (3) qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 -> qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 works
>> Will fail, that is true, but I can think a "sane" way to fix this.
Hi
> That's a great summary indeed.
Thanks.
>>> Is it necessary to also handle that? Maybe by special casing the error
>>> condition in get_pci_config_device() to be prepared to accept such a
>>> stream from 8.0?
>> Well, we can do that, but it is to the pci maintainers to decide if
>> that
>> is "sane".
>
> So, can we go from here somewhere? I'd love this fix to be in 8.0.1,
> either with or without the (un)sane part of the (3) variant above which
> might fail. Or else we'll have the same situation in 8.0.1 as we now
> have in 8.0.0 (the deadline is May-27).
>
> We did broke x.y.0 => x.y.1 migration before already like this, such as
> with 7.2.0=>7.2.1. I'm not saying it's a nice thing to do, just stating
> a fact. Yes, it is better to avoid such breakage, but.. meh..
See patch for documentation:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-05/msg03288.html
Basically, the best we can do is:
- get the patch posted. Fixes everything except:
(3) qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 -> qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 works
And for that, we can document somewhere that we need to launch
qemu-8.0.1 as:
$ qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 -device blah,x-pci-err-unc-mask=on
And mark someone that this machine is tainted an can only be migrated to
qemu's >= qemu-8.0.1. And that we should reboot it as the user
convenience. (reboot here means poweroff qemu and poweron it back
without x-pci-err-unc-mask=on).
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-03 0:27 [PATCH v1 1/1] hw/pci: Disable PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK register for machine type < 8.0 Leonardo Bras
2023-05-03 9:32 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-05-03 15:54 ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2023-05-03 15:10 ` Peter Xu
2023-05-03 17:04 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-09 14:01 ` Peter Xu
2023-05-09 15:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-09 15:32 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-10 16:29 ` Michael Tokarev
2023-05-10 16:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-10 16:42 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-11 8:27 ` Fiona Ebner
2023-05-11 8:40 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-18 7:34 ` Michael Tokarev
2023-05-18 11:33 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2023-05-18 13:27 ` Peter Xu
2023-05-18 15:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-18 15:27 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-18 15:20 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-11 10:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-11 11:43 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-11 12:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-22 15:25 ` Jiri Denemark
2023-05-26 7:55 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-28 6:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wn15dgbs.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.