From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D8DEC77B76 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pqrxG-0001jv-FI; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 04:53:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pqrxB-0001jH-Fm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 04:53:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pqrwz-0005An-FS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 04:53:44 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-2febac9cacdso2437856f8f.1 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 01:53:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1682326411; x=1684918411; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=IuvtM1nDas+TYXWcaGsxpp1Jv6ixnjwWHOHmZGkpVUA=; b=doqygxPNyMxiwbhpBxNyL8d8ibWU/QMtG3tRz6pwZ2NlNfi99squ1z2pqZGM/3dYtB KgjCyZnNnn6U4gI+yWng94Re4tRxoJH+073MrfuJbfCTG1qVaf4Z/hmWfWP2ZWZscEnY Mv8mHuaiGHjonkZ5jrrP6af2YKHvxrYxmPraW72akW47yFeOZgc8cZqa/T7csChhwCPA sknqN0NvMoUGwwtSrWP0dAV/SQ0BvfQekr5Ieu0dSUBJFF2x46hjjxr7Q90+Aq9RtWVx h1hJjTWjCzkzje0yIffghiHei4gh+FdO8kkdYCp8jsRDVK1PxLsypfli7kVQeDiLQz59 QDfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682326411; x=1684918411; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IuvtM1nDas+TYXWcaGsxpp1Jv6ixnjwWHOHmZGkpVUA=; b=SJP3XXmWr0gQfn5ydlG7mq6PAaMPlGpahUZUIEErAw/oDegZ04CcSfTClwWHGZsiV9 7i5U8q/m7UkHPVg+furL14GBBzQH/jmc4FQP0cxq5Qoa8qw6jqCaa1C0vMtwPMc6IyET R4BvAcRenkIYux8C2LRzB0zBsvD8ahl+W3Bpx7vLutnpyUtaks6cvjGbC4Q/OP9hkuVe bxUHkGkxwWjbFQGPAexXD3co+UanKxZURj/yHXSaruOXEIpoBQAkaohoh5SQJ8nCoe4G UBYV6wCWnyu49d/gN1CrkUAF/8aK49KXoBsQUT4OmJnLig8bFmY0bBOOPkgFOiyGHj4C REQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dtdrKNiz7vOLdqFRylB/YLhYYV64BvOgvgrHcNyoeBr7LOww7i BdqrvdjIfaiHvwgtEP58yQSPfQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YFQhHxuBYSWZSB61XTt06nXdkKSkM0+vDW+m2RA7BjP5d3MetTJVbl5++zqVyIpbsfm+xqRA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a49:0:b0:2f7:bced:9d6f with SMTP id t9-20020a5d6a49000000b002f7bced9d6fmr8322333wrw.62.1682326410957; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 01:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([85.9.250.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c16-20020a05600c0ad000b003f198dfbbfcsm5919518wmr.19.2023.04.24.01.53.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Apr 2023 01:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BED11FFB7; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 09:53:30 +0100 (BST) References: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.11.3; emacs 29.0.90 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Kautuk Consul Cc: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Thomas Huth , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Beraldo Leal , Cleber Rosa , Harsh Prateek Bora , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 09:53:23 +0100 In-reply-to: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <87wn21acfp.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Kautuk Consul writes: > Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the > boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc > decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it > was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified > to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve > this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line > arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py > test-case. > > The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally > with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: Queued to testing/next, thanks. --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro