From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@kernel.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] libbpf: remove deprecated APIs
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2022 12:01:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wndwvjax.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220603190155.3924899-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> writes:
> This patch set removes all the deprecated APIs in preparation for 1.0 release.
> It also makes libbpf_set_strict_mode() a no-op (but keeps it to let per-1.0
> applications buildable and dynamically linkable against libbpf 1.0 if they
> were already libbpf-1.0 ready) and starts enforcing all the
> behaviors that were previously opt-in through libbpf_set_strict_mode().
>
> xsk.{c,h} parts that are now properly provided by libxdp ([0]) are still used
> by xdpxceiver.c in selftest/bpf, so I've moved xsk.{c,h} with barely any
> changes to under selftests/bpf.
>
> Other than that, apart from removing all the LIBBPF_DEPRECATED-marked APIs,
> there is a bunch of internal clean ups allowed by that. I've also "restored"
> libbpf.map inheritance chain while removing all the deprecated APIs. I think
> that's the right way to do this, as applications using libbpf as shared
> library but not relying on any deprecated APIs (i.e., "good citizens" that
> prepared for libbpf 1.0 release ahead of time to minimize disruption) should
> be able to link both against 0.x and 1.x versions. Either way, it doesn't seem
> to break anything and preserve a history on when each "surviving" API was
> added.
>
> NOTE. This shouldn't be yet landed until Jiri's changes ([1]) removing last
> deprecated API usage in perf lands. But I thought to post it now to get the
> ball rolling.
Any chance you could push this to a branch of github as well? Makes it
easier to test libxdp against it :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-04 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-03 19:01 [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] libbpf: remove deprecated APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/15] libbpf: move xsk.{c,h} into selftests/bpf Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/15] libbpf: remove deprecated low-level APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/15] libbpf: remove deprecated XDP APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/15] libbpf: remove deprecated probing APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/15] libbpf: remove deprecated BTF APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/15] libbpf: clean up perfbuf APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/15] libbpf: remove prog_info_linear APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/15] libbpf: remove most other deprecated high-level APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/15] libbpf: remove multi-instance and custom private data APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/15] libbpf: cleanup LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE supporting macros for v0.x Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/15] libbpf: remove internal multi-instance prog support Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/15] libbpf: clean up SEC() handling Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/15] selftests/bpf: remove last tests with legacy BPF map definitions Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/15] libbpf: enforce strict libbpf 1.0 behaviors Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-03 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/15] libbpf: fix up few libbpf.map problems Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-04 10:01 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2022-06-04 16:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] libbpf: remove deprecated APIs Dave Thaler
2022-06-06 0:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-24 15:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-06-24 20:57 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wndwvjax.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.