From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, danielhb413@gmail.com,
npiggin@gmail.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, clg@kaod.org,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spapr: Report correct GTSE support via ov5
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 16:51:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnh1a8mu.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220309012400.2527157-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> QEMU reports MMU support to the guest via the ibm,architecture-vec-5
> property of the /chosen node. Byte number 26 specifies Radix Table
> Expansions, currently only GTSE (Guest Translation Shootdown
> Enable). This feature determines whether the tlbie instruction (and
> others) are HV privileged.
>
> Up until now, we always reported GTSE=1 to guests. Even after the
> support for GTSE=0 was added. As part of that support, a kernel
> command line radix_hcall_invalidate=on was introduced that overrides
> the GTSE value received via CAS. So a guest can run with GTSE=0 and
> use the H_RPT_INVALIDATE hcall instead of tlbie.
>
> In this scenario, having GTSE always set to 1 by QEMU leads to a crash
> when running nested KVM guests because KVM does not allow a nested
> hypervisor to set GTSE support for its nested guests. So a nested
> guest always uses the same value for LPCR_GTSE as its HV. Since the
> nested HV disabled GTSE, but the L2 QEMU always reports GTSE=1, we run
> into a crash when:
>
> L1 LPCR_GTSE=0
> L2 LPCR_GTSE=0
> L2 CAS GTSE=1
>
> The nested guest will run 'tlbie' and crash because the HW looks at
> LPCR_GTSE, which is clear.
>
> Having GTSE disabled in the L1 and enabled in the L2 is not an option
> because the whole purpose of GTSE is to disallow access to tlbie and
> we cannot allow L1 to spawn L2s that can access features that L1
> itself cannot.
>
> We also cannot have the guest check the LPCR bit, because LPCR is
> HV-privileged.
>
> So this patch goes through the most intuitive route which is to have
> QEMU ask KVM about GTSE support and advertise the correct value to the
> guest. A new KVM_CAP_PPC_GTSE capability is being added.
>
> TCG continues to always enable GTSE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> target/ppc/kvm.c | 8 ++++++++
> target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 4cc204f90d..3e95a1831f 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ static void spapr_dt_ov5_platform_support(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
> 23, 0x00, /* XICS / XIVE mode */
> 24, 0x00, /* Hash/Radix, filled in below. */
> 25, 0x00, /* Hash options: Segment Tables == no, GTSE == no. */
> - 26, 0x40, /* Radix options: GTSE == yes. */
> + 26, 0x00, /* Radix options, filled in below. */
> };
>
> if (spapr->irq->xics && spapr->irq->xive) {
> @@ -1000,10 +1000,16 @@ static void spapr_dt_ov5_platform_support(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
> } else {
> val[3] = 0x00; /* Hash */
> }
> +
> + if (kvmppc_has_cap_gtse()) {
> + val[7] = 0x40 /* OV5_MMU_RADIX_GTSE */;
> + }
This needs the same treatment as below to support kernels that don't
know about the cap. Also, look at that semicolon! =D
> } else {
> /* V3 MMU supports both hash and radix in tcg (with dynamic switching) */
> val[3] = 0xC0;
> + val[7] = 0x40 /* OV5_MMU_RADIX_GTSE */;
> }
> +
> _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, chosen, "ibm,arch-vec-5-platform-support",
> val, sizeof(val)));
> }
> @@ -2824,14 +2830,32 @@ static void spapr_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
> /* Init numa_assoc_array */
> spapr_numa_associativity_init(spapr, machine);
>
> - if ((!kvm_enabled() || kvmppc_has_cap_mmu_radix()) &&
> - ppc_type_check_compat(machine->cpu_type, CPU_POWERPC_LOGICAL_3_00, 0,
> + if (ppc_type_check_compat(machine->cpu_type, CPU_POWERPC_LOGICAL_3_00, 0,
> spapr->max_compat_pvr)) {
> - spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_MMU_RADIX_300);
> - /* KVM and TCG always allow GTSE with radix... */
> - spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_MMU_RADIX_GTSE);
> +
> + /* TCG always supports Radix w/ GTSE */
> + if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> + spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_MMU_RADIX_300);
> + spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_MMU_RADIX_GTSE);
> + } else {
> + if (kvmppc_has_cap_mmu_radix()) {
> + spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_MMU_RADIX_300);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Only disable Guest Translation Shootdown if KVM
> + * supports the H_RPT_INVALIDATE hypercall, otherwise we'd
> + * leave the guest with no way to make TLB invalidations.
> + */
> + if (kvmppc_has_cap_rpt_invalidate()) {
> + if (kvmppc_has_cap_gtse()) {
> + spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_MMU_RADIX_GTSE);
> + }
> + } else {
> + spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_MMU_RADIX_GTSE);
> + }
> + }
> }
> - /* ... but not with hash (currently). */
>
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> /* Enable H_LOGICAL_CI_* so SLOF can talk to in-kernel devices */
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> index dc93b99189..91582c4b15 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ static int cap_ppc_nested_kvm_hv;
> static int cap_large_decr;
> static int cap_fwnmi;
> static int cap_rpt_invalidate;
> +static int cap_gtse;
>
> static uint32_t debug_inst_opcode;
>
> @@ -154,6 +155,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
> }
>
> cap_rpt_invalidate = kvm_vm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_RPT_INVALIDATE);
> + cap_gtse = kvm_vm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_GTSE);
> +
> kvm_ppc_register_host_cpu_type();
>
> return 0;
> @@ -2397,6 +2400,11 @@ bool kvmppc_has_cap_mmu_hash_v3(void)
> return cap_mmu_hash_v3;
> }
>
> +bool kvmppc_has_cap_gtse(void)
> +{
> + return cap_gtse;
> +}
> +
> static bool kvmppc_power8_host(void)
> {
> bool ret = false;
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h b/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> index ee9325bf9a..7d6980edb7 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ bool kvmppc_has_cap_fixup_hcalls(void);
> bool kvmppc_has_cap_htm(void);
> bool kvmppc_has_cap_mmu_radix(void);
> bool kvmppc_has_cap_mmu_hash_v3(void);
> +bool kvmppc_has_cap_gtse(void);
> bool kvmppc_has_cap_xive(void);
> int kvmppc_get_cap_safe_cache(void);
> int kvmppc_get_cap_safe_bounds_check(void);
> @@ -343,6 +344,11 @@ static inline bool kvmppc_has_cap_mmu_hash_v3(void)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline bool kvmppc_has_cap_gtse(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool kvmppc_has_cap_xive(void)
> {
> return false;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-09 1:23 [RFC PATCH 1/2] spapr: Report correct GTSE support via ov5 Fabiano Rosas
2022-03-09 1:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] linux-headers: Add KVM_CAP_PPC_GTSE Fabiano Rosas
2022-03-09 19:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] spapr: Report correct GTSE support via ov5 Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-03-11 14:45 ` Fabiano Rosas
2022-03-10 19:51 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2022-03-11 0:30 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-03-12 9:17 ` David Gibson
2022-03-14 22:10 ` Fabiano Rosas
2022-03-31 4:29 ` David Gibson
2022-04-01 7:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-04-01 15:50 ` Fabiano Rosas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnh1a8mu.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.