From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: P Praneesh <ppranees@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Sriram R <srirrama@codeaurora.org>,
Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] ath11k: modify dp_rx desc access wrapper calls inline
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:35:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnldixf1.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1630560820-21905-4-git-send-email-ppranees@codeaurora.org> (P. Praneesh's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:03:31 +0530")
P Praneesh <ppranees@codeaurora.org> writes:
> In data path, to reduce the CPU cycles spending on descriptor access
> wrapper function, changed those functions as static inline.
>
> Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1.r2-00012-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
> Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01695-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>
> Co-developed-by: Sriram R <srirrama@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sriram R <srirrama@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: P Praneesh <ppranees@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> index 9a22481..b84c2db 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> @@ -20,13 +20,15 @@
>
> #define ATH11K_DP_RX_FRAGMENT_TIMEOUT_MS (2 * HZ)
>
> -static u8 *ath11k_dp_rx_h_80211_hdr(struct ath11k_base *ab, struct hal_rx_desc *desc)
> +static inline
> +u8 *ath11k_dp_rx_h_80211_hdr(struct ath11k_base *ab, struct hal_rx_desc *desc)
> {
> return ab->hw_params.hw_ops->rx_desc_get_hdr_status(desc);
> }
The compiler does not optimise small static functions like this
automatically to inline? I'm surprised. Or are you using some really old
compiler?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: P Praneesh <ppranees@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Sriram R <srirrama@codeaurora.org>,
Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] ath11k: modify dp_rx desc access wrapper calls inline
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:35:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnldixf1.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1630560820-21905-4-git-send-email-ppranees@codeaurora.org> (P. Praneesh's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:03:31 +0530")
P Praneesh <ppranees@codeaurora.org> writes:
> In data path, to reduce the CPU cycles spending on descriptor access
> wrapper function, changed those functions as static inline.
>
> Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1.r2-00012-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
> Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01695-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>
> Co-developed-by: Sriram R <srirrama@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sriram R <srirrama@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: P Praneesh <ppranees@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> index 9a22481..b84c2db 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> @@ -20,13 +20,15 @@
>
> #define ATH11K_DP_RX_FRAGMENT_TIMEOUT_MS (2 * HZ)
>
> -static u8 *ath11k_dp_rx_h_80211_hdr(struct ath11k_base *ab, struct hal_rx_desc *desc)
> +static inline
> +u8 *ath11k_dp_rx_h_80211_hdr(struct ath11k_base *ab, struct hal_rx_desc *desc)
> {
> return ab->hw_params.hw_ops->rx_desc_get_hdr_status(desc);
> }
The compiler does not optimise small static functions like this
automatically to inline? I'm surprised. Or are you using some really old
compiler?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-12 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 5:33 [PATCH v3 00/12] ath11k: optimizations in data path P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ath11k: disable unused CE8 interrupts for ipq8074 P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-11-15 9:22 ` Kalle Valo
2021-11-15 9:22 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] ath11k: allocate dst ring descriptors from cacheable memory P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ath11k: modify dp_rx desc access wrapper calls inline P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-11-12 8:35 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2021-11-12 8:35 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ath11k: avoid additional access to ath11k_hal_srng_dst_num_free P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ath11k: avoid active pdev check for each msdu P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ath11k: remove usage quota while processing rx packets P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ath11k: add branch predictors in process_rx P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ath11k: allocate HAL_WBM2SW_RELEASE ring from cacheable memory P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ath11k: remove mod operator in dst ring processing P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ath11k: avoid while loop in ring selection of tx completion interrupt P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ath11k: add branch predictors in dp_tx path P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ath11k: avoid unnecessary lock contention in tx_completion path P Praneesh
2021-09-02 5:33 ` P Praneesh
2021-11-12 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] ath11k: optimizations in data path Kalle Valo
2021-11-12 13:07 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnldixf1.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jouni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ppranees@codeaurora.org \
--cc=srirrama@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.