From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C62C48BE0 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1AD61040 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238731AbhFILT2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:19:28 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:42035 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237111AbhFILT1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:19:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623237452; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7/EvuWhOmpP5HtgdZKnFM0nVXB2/orSC1ErHoXwsn38=; b=Hgj+STDtqRbzme9xn29KA7gdU9hPzY3HX2eWdtVciQbQ51loYShKyVH1ckuvsud739916o 4+yFFkx5ing5VS+/yxvB8uZkg7ALNFSPjrlq3lGLoJCvLBfRdjq5yjf9LOmKf3Xs+Hp6PI Y3Yv0ouAKdOybJIzC7CJ9MvJrvz1UAI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-284-9jIiynNZNO-3r2eyrbK47Q-1; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 07:17:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9jIiynNZNO-3r2eyrbK47Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22B35802B78; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.40.192.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1681037E81; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:17:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Petr Lautrbach To: liwugang , selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: cgzones@googlemail.com, liwugang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpolicy: fix the leak memory when uses xperms In-Reply-To: <20210601151704.2688389-1-liwugang@163.com> References: <87o8crcljy.fsf@redhat.com> <20210601151704.2688389-1-liwugang@163.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:17:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87wnr3nv7b.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org liwugang writes: > In the define_te_avtab_ioctl function: > 1. the parameter avrule_template has been copied to > new elements which added to avrule list through > the function avrule_cpy, so it should free avrule_template. > 2. And for rangelist, it does not free the allocated memory. > > The memory leak can by found by using memory sanitizer: > ================================================================= > ==20021==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 10336 byte(s) in 76 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x7f8f96d9cb50 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb50) > #1 0x55c2e9447fb3 in define_te_avtab_xperms_helper /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2046 > #2 0x55c2e944a6ca in define_te_avtab_extended_perms /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2479 > #3 0x55c2e943126b in yyparse /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/policy_parse.y:494 > #4 0x55c2e9440221 in read_source_policy /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/parse_util.c:64 > #5 0x55c2e945a3df in main /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/checkpolicy.c:619 > #6 0x7f8f968eeb96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) > > Direct leak of 240 byte(s) in 15 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x7f8f96d9cb50 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb50) > #1 0x55c2e9446cd9 in avrule_sort_ioctls /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/policy_define.c:1846 > #2 0x55c2e9447d8f in avrule_ioctl_ranges /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2020 > #3 0x55c2e944a0de in define_te_avtab_ioctl /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2409 > #4 0x55c2e944a744 in define_te_avtab_extended_perms /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2485 > #5 0x55c2e94312bf in yyparse /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/policy_parse.y:503 > #6 0x55c2e9440221 in read_source_policy /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/parse_util.c:64 > #7 0x55c2e945a3df in main /mnt/sources/tools/selinux/checkpolicy/checkpolicy.c:619 > #8 0x7f8f968eeb96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) > > Tested-By: Christian Gttsche > Signed-off-by: liwugang > --- > checkpolicy/policy_define.c | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/checkpolicy/policy_define.c b/checkpolicy/policy_define.c > index 16234f31..52105d3a 100644 > --- a/checkpolicy/policy_define.c > +++ b/checkpolicy/policy_define.c > @@ -2400,7 +2400,7 @@ int avrule_cpy(avrule_t *dest, avrule_t *src) > int define_te_avtab_ioctl(avrule_t *avrule_template) > { > avrule_t *avrule; > - struct av_ioctl_range_list *rangelist; > + struct av_ioctl_range_list *rangelist, *r; > av_extended_perms_t *complete_driver, *partial_driver, *xperms; > unsigned int i; > > @@ -2458,6 +2458,12 @@ done: > if (partial_driver) > free(partial_driver); > > + while (rangelist != NULL) { > + r = rangelist; > + rangelist = rangelist->next; > + free(r); > + } > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -2484,6 +2490,8 @@ int define_te_avtab_extended_perms(int which) > free(id); > if (define_te_avtab_ioctl(avrule_template)) > return -1; > + avrule_destroy(avrule_template); > + free(avrule_template); I still think that avrule_template should be free'd before return -1. If I'm wrong please explain > } else { > yyerror("only ioctl extended permissions are supported"); > free(id); > -- > 2.30.2