From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tests: Avoid side effects inside g_assert() arguments
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 09:48:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnseop5r.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210503165525.26221-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> For us, assertions are always enabled, but side-effect expressions
> inside the argument to g_assert() are bad style anyway. Fix three
> occurrences in IPMI related tests, which will silence some Coverity
> nits.
>
> Fixes: CID 1432322, CID 1432287, CID 1432291
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> tests/qtest/ipmi-bt-test.c | 6 ++++--
> tests/qtest/ipmi-kcs-test.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/ipmi-bt-test.c b/tests/qtest/ipmi-bt-test.c
> index a42207d416f..8492f02a9c3 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/ipmi-bt-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/ipmi-bt-test.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ static void bt_wait_b_busy(void)
> {
> unsigned int count = 1000;
> while (IPMI_BT_CTLREG_GET_B_BUSY() != 0) {
> - g_assert(--count != 0);
> + --count;
> + g_assert(count != 0);
This does seem a little weird - we are not asserting an interface
violation just that the read should have cleared in 1000 * 100 usec. If
it doesn't is that really a theoretically impossible situation or just
an example of a failed test.
That said looking at how deeply buried in the test these helpers are an
assert is probably better than a convoluted attempt to return out and
exit the test with a failure.
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> usleep(100);
> }
> }
> @@ -107,7 +108,8 @@ static void bt_wait_b2h_atn(void)
> {
> unsigned int count = 1000;
> while (IPMI_BT_CTLREG_GET_B2H_ATN() == 0) {
> - g_assert(--count != 0);
> + --count;
> + g_assert(count != 0);
> usleep(100);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/ipmi-kcs-test.c b/tests/qtest/ipmi-kcs-test.c
> index fc0a918c8d1..afc24dd3e46 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/ipmi-kcs-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/ipmi-kcs-test.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ static void kcs_wait_ibf(void)
> {
> unsigned int count = 1000;
> while (IPMI_KCS_CMDREG_GET_IBF() != 0) {
> - g_assert(--count != 0);
> + --count;
> + g_assert(count != 0);
> }
> }
--
Alex Bennée
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-04 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-03 16:55 [PATCH 0/3] tests: three easy Coverity fixes Peter Maydell
2021-05-03 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] tests/qtest/tpm-util.c: Free memory with correct free function Peter Maydell
2021-05-03 16:59 ` Stefan Berger
2021-05-04 8:44 ` Alex Bennée
2021-05-03 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] tests/qtest/rtc-test: Remove pointless NULL check Peter Maydell
2021-05-04 5:43 ` Thomas Huth
2021-05-04 8:47 ` Alex Bennée
2021-05-03 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] tests: Avoid side effects inside g_assert() arguments Peter Maydell
2021-05-03 17:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-05-04 7:18 ` Thomas Huth
2021-05-04 8:46 ` Peter Maydell
2021-05-04 8:48 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnseop5r.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.