All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	hpa@zytor.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for split_lock_detect
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:42:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wo79d27e.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324180207.GD5998@linux.intel.com>

Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:40:18AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> 
>> It's very much about whether the host is split lock clean.
>> 
>> If your host kernel is not, then this wants to be fixed first. If your
>> host application is broken, then either fix it or use "warn".
>
> The "kvm only" option was my suggestion.  The thought was to provide a way
> for users to leverage KVM to debug/test kernels without having to have a
> known good kernel and/or to minimize the risk of crashing their physical
> system.  E.g. debug a misbehaving driver by assigning its associated device
> to a guest.

warn is giving you that, right? I won't crash the host because the #AC
triggers in guest context.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-24 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-15  5:05 [PATCH v5 0/9] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of " Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-21  0:41   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-23 17:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-23 20:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24  1:10       ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 10:29         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25  0:18           ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  0:52             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 11:51     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 13:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-21  0:43   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-23 17:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-23 17:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24  1:16     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for split_lock_detect Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-21  0:46   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-23 17:10   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24  1:38     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 10:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 18:02         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-24 18:42           ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-03-25  0:43         ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  1:03           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock() Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-21  0:48   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-23  2:18 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] x86/split_lock: Add feature " Xiaoyao Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wo79d27e.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.