From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07877C4CECE for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC44B206FA for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DC44B206FA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9201089681; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JQy47PHzRlUV; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6C489671; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E5EC18D3; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C769C0177; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B92204E0; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpN0u6Q7Z1AW; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86ED0204BE; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2020 08:08:12 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,549,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="237247874" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([10.252.52.87]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2020 08:08:09 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" In-Reply-To: <20200313145206.GE225435@mit.edu> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20200313031947.GC225435@mit.edu> <87d09gljhj.fsf@intel.com> <20200313093548.GA2089143@kroah.com> <24c64c56-947b-4267-33b8-49a22f719c81@suse.cz> <20200313100755.GA2161605@kroah.com> <20200313103720.GA2215823@kroah.com> <20200313081216.627c5bdf@gandalf.local.home> <874kusl50q.fsf@intel.com> <20200313145206.GE225435@mit.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:08:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87wo7ojnrl.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections -- Change to charter X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Have you considered whether the eligibility for running and voting >> should be made the same? As it is, absolutely anyone can self-nominate >> and run. > > That's always been the case. However, at least historically, people > who weren't physically present has never been successful. Oh? May I ask for that to be clarified in the TAB charter, please. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Jani Nikula In-Reply-To: <20200313145206.GE225435@mit.edu> References: <20200313031947.GC225435@mit.edu> <87d09gljhj.fsf@intel.com> <20200313093548.GA2089143@kroah.com> <24c64c56-947b-4267-33b8-49a22f719c81@suse.cz> <20200313100755.GA2161605@kroah.com> <20200313103720.GA2215823@kroah.com> <20200313081216.627c5bdf@gandalf.local.home> <874kusl50q.fsf@intel.com> <20200313145206.GE225435@mit.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:08:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87wo7ojnrl.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections -- Change to charter List-Id: Public TAB discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Vlastimil Babka On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Have you considered whether the eligibility for running and voting >> should be made the same? As it is, absolutely anyone can self-nominate >> and run. > > That's always been the case. However, at least historically, people > who weren't physically present has never been successful. Oh? May I ask for that to be clarified in the TAB charter, please. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E237C10DCE for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF78620768 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727021AbgCMPIM (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:08:12 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:10939 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726973AbgCMPIM (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:08:12 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2020 08:08:12 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,549,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="237247874" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([10.252.52.87]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2020 08:08:09 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Steven Rostedt , Geert Uytterhoeven , "tech-board-discuss\@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "ksummit-discuss\@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Vlastimil Babka , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections -- Change to charter In-Reply-To: <20200313145206.GE225435@mit.edu> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20200313031947.GC225435@mit.edu> <87d09gljhj.fsf@intel.com> <20200313093548.GA2089143@kroah.com> <24c64c56-947b-4267-33b8-49a22f719c81@suse.cz> <20200313100755.GA2161605@kroah.com> <20200313103720.GA2215823@kroah.com> <20200313081216.627c5bdf@gandalf.local.home> <874kusl50q.fsf@intel.com> <20200313145206.GE225435@mit.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:08:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87wo7ojnrl.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Have you considered whether the eligibility for running and voting >> should be made the same? As it is, absolutely anyone can self-nominate >> and run. > > That's always been the case. However, at least historically, people > who weren't physically present has never been successful. Oh? May I ask for that to be clarified in the TAB charter, please. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center