Re: powerpc Linux scv support and scv system call ABI proposal

[Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>]

* Segher Boessenkool:

> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 05:04:49PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Segher Boessenkool:
>> 
>> >> > I don't think we can save LR in a regular register around the system
>> >> > call, explicitly in the inline asm statement, because we still have to
>> >> > generate proper unwinding information using CFI directives, something
>> >> > that you cannot do from within the asm statement.
>> >
>> > Why not?
>> 
>> As far as I knowm there isn't a CFI directive that allows us to restore
>> the CFI state at the end of the inline assembly.  If we say that LR is
>> stored in a different register than what the rest of the function uses,
>> that would lead to incorrect CFI after the exit of the inline assembler
>> fragment.
>> 
>> At least that's what I think.  Compilers aren't really my thing.
>
> .cfi_restore?  Or .cfi_remember_state / .cfi_restore_state, that is
> probably easiest in inline assembler.

Oh, right, .cfi_remember_state and .cfi_restore_state should work, as
long as -fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm isn't used (but that's okay given that we
need this only for the glibc build).

But it looks like we can use an explicit "lr" clobber, so we should be
good anyway.

>> >> > GCC does not model the condition registers,
>> >
>> > Huh?  It does model the condition register, as 8 registers in GCC's
>> > internal model (one each for CR0..CR7).
>> 
>> But GCC doesn't expose them as integers to C code, so you can't do much
>> without them.
>
> Sure, it doesn't expose any other registers directly, either.

I can use r0 & 1 with a register variable r0 to check a bit.  I don't
think writing a similar check against a condition register is possible
today.

Thanks,
Florian