From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinicius Costa Gomes Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 10:36:46 -0700 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v6 10/10] igb: Add support for adding offloaded clsflower filters In-Reply-To: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B8C82598F@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20180329210751.11531-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> <20180329210751.11531-11-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B8C82598F@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: <87woxgjn81.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: Hi, "Brown, Aaron F" writes: >> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at osuosl.org] On >> Behalf Of Vinicius Costa Gomes >> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 2:08 PM >> To: intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org >> Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; Sanchez-Palencia, Jesus > palencia at intel.com> >> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v6 10/10] igb: Add support for >> adding offloaded clsflower filters >> >> This allows filters added by tc-flower and specifying MAC addresses, >> Ethernet types, and the VLAN priority field, to be offloaded to the >> controller. > > Can I get a brief explanation for enabling this? I'm currently happy > with this patch series from a regression perspective, but am > personally a bit, umm, challenged with tc in general but would like to > run it through the paces a bit. If it can be done in a one or two > liner I think it would be a good addition to the patch description. Of course, my bad for not adding those examples since the begining. Cheers, -- Vinicius From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinicius Costa Gomes Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v6 10/10] igb: Add support for adding offloaded clsflower filters Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 10:36:46 -0700 Message-ID: <87woxgjn81.fsf@intel.com> References: <20180329210751.11531-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> <20180329210751.11531-11-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B8C82598F@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" , "Sanchez-Palencia\, Jesus" To: "Brown\, Aaron F" , "intel-wired-lan\@lists.osuosl.org" Return-path: Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:15763 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752351AbeDIRgu (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:36:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B8C82598F@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, "Brown, Aaron F" writes: >> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org] On >> Behalf Of Vinicius Costa Gomes >> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 2:08 PM >> To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org >> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Sanchez-Palencia, Jesus > palencia@intel.com> >> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v6 10/10] igb: Add support for >> adding offloaded clsflower filters >> >> This allows filters added by tc-flower and specifying MAC addresses, >> Ethernet types, and the VLAN priority field, to be offloaded to the >> controller. > > Can I get a brief explanation for enabling this? I'm currently happy > with this patch series from a regression perspective, but am > personally a bit, umm, challenged with tc in general but would like to > run it through the paces a bit. If it can be done in a one or two > liner I think it would be a good addition to the patch description. Of course, my bad for not adding those examples since the begining. Cheers,