From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: imre.deak@intel.com, "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/ddi: Avoid long delays during system suspend / eDP disabling
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 17:40:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wp8vhitz.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170601142046.GD14610@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, 01 Jun 2017, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:58:50PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:55:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > On Wed, 31 May 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:05:35PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
>> > >> Atm disabling either DP or eDP outputs can generate a spurious short
>> > >> pulse interrupt. The reason is that after disabling the port the source
>> > >> will stop sending a valid stream data, while the sink expects either a
>> > >> valid stream or the idle pattern. Since neither of this is sent the sink
>> > >> assumes (after an arbitrary delay) that the link is lost and requests
>> > >> for link retraining with a short pulse.
>> > >>
>> > >> The spurious pulse is a real problem at least for eDP panels with long
>> > >> power-off / power-cycle delays: as part of disabling the output we
>> > >> disable the panel power. The subsequent spurious short pulse handling
>> > >> will have to turn the power back on, which means the driver has to do a
>> > >> redundant wait for the power-off and power-cycle delays. During system
>> > >> suspend this leads to an unnecessary delay up to ~1s on systems with
>> > >> such panels as reported by Rui.
>> > >>
>> > >> To fix this put the sink to DPMS D3 state before turning off the port.
>> > >> According to the DP spec in this state the sink should not request
>> > >> retraining. This is also what we do already on pre-ddi platforms.
>> > >>
>> > >> As an alternative I also tried configuring the port to send idle pattern
>> > >> - which is against BSPec - and leave the port in normal mode before
>> > >> turning off the port. Neither of these resolved the problem.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>> > >> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> Reported-and-tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> > >
>> > > Makes sense to me.
>> >
>> > I wonder if we should write D0 on hotplug.
>>
>> D0 is the default power state IIRC, so when you plug something in it
>> should automagically go into D0. That's actually a slight problem
>> power-wise if there's no subsequent modeset to drop it into D3.
>
> There was this DP->VGA adaptor that seems to require that we set D0
> explicitly:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99114#c5
>
> But it's an odd behaviour, the DPCD read itself succeeds, only reading a
> certain register fails (DPCD_SINK_COUNT). Based on the DP spec a sink
> should respond to AUX transfers even after being put to D3, possibly
> with a longer wake-up delay (up to 20ms AFAIR).
Also [1] where AFAICT there isn't even a hotplug after D3.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101044
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-31 17:05 [PATCH] drm/i915/ddi: Avoid long delays during system suspend / eDP disabling Imre Deak
2017-05-31 17:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 12:55 ` Jani Nikula
2017-06-01 13:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 14:18 ` Jani Nikula
2017-06-01 14:20 ` Imre Deak
2017-06-01 14:40 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-05-31 17:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-06-01 12:17 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wp8vhitz.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.