From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqE2e-00040m-2d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:17:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqE2d-0006Vy-6V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:17:16 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1490014548-15083-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1490014548-15083-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:17:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Eric Blake's message of "Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:03:37 -0500") Message-ID: <87wpbjt7yl.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add myself for files I touched recently List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Thomas Huth Eric Blake writes: > On 03/20/2017 07:55 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake > > By the way, where do we stand on the idea of having checkpatch.pl reject > patches that introduce new files without mentioning a maintainer? Stuck. Thomas hasn't followed up on his RFC PATCH because he's afraid of false positives. I encouraged him to rescue at least "[RFC PATCH 4/5] checkpatch: emit a reminder about MAINTAINERS on file add/move/delete", and I'm now encouraging him again.