From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjffR-0006Uf-6u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:22:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjffQ-00089I-DF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:22:13 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1488491046-2549-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1488491046-2549-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 06:22:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Eric Blake's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:13:52 -0600") Message-ID: <87wpc76ikj.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/15] sheepdog: Fix error handling in sd_snapshot_delete() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, mitake.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp, jcody@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, namei.unix@gmail.com Eric Blake writes: > On 03/02/2017 03:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> As a bdrv_snapshot_delete() method, sd_snapshot_delete() must set an >> error and return negative errno on failure. It sometimes returns -1, >> and sometimes neglects to set an error. It also prints error messages >> with error_report(). Fix all that. >> >> Moreover, its handling of an attempt to delete an nonexistent snapshot >> is wrong: it error_report()s and succeeds. Fix it to set an error and >> return -ENOENT instead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- >> block/sheepdog.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> > >> @@ -2447,15 +2444,14 @@ static bool remove_objects(BDRVSheepdogState *s) >> data_vdi_id[start_idx]), >> false, s->cache_flags); >> if (ret < 0) { >> - error_report("failed to discard snapshot inode."); >> - result = false; >> + error_setg(errp, "failed to discard snapshot inode."); > > Lose the trailing '.' Good idea. > With that fixed, > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Thanks!