From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chA7D-0000vQ-2L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:16:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chA79-00030s-4U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:16:31 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]:33410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chA78-00030m-UL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:16:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u47so7318437wrb.0 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:16:26 -0800 (PST) References: <20170223182927.7166-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 07:16:24 +0000 Message-ID: <87wpcgxdmf.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v14 00/24] MTTCG Base enabling patches with ARM enablement List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mttcg@greensocs.com, fred.konrad@greensocs.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com, cota@braap.org, bobby.prani@gmail.com, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, serge.fdrv@gmail.com, bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org Richard Henderson writes: > On 02/24/2017 05:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Hi Richard/Peter, >> >> Well obviously it was expecting a bit much for v13 to pass with flying >> colours. A merge failure which didn't affect ARM caused the >> regressions on other platforms resulting in the iothread not being >> released during cpu_handle_interrupt. This fix has been merged into >> Jan's drop global lock patch. I also fixed a whitespace issue on the >> error_report/printf for the memory order check. > > LGTM. I've re-tested with Alpha and everything seems to be ok. > You've got all of my R-B already. Cool. >> So if you are happy are you going to be able to submit the pull >> request before the soft-freeze kicks in? > > Are you looking for someone else to sent the pull? I suspect that > Peter and I are happy for you to do so. I was following convention: "Generally only existing submaintainers of a tree will need to submit pull requests, although occasionally for a large patch series we might ask a submitter to send a pull request. " So if Peter is happy I'll send the pullreq today. Peter? -- Alex Bennée