Re: Unprivileged containers and co-ordinating user namespaces

[ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)]

James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:

> On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 16:00 -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 03:02:08PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> > /etc/usernamespaces
>> > 
>> > and the format be :::
>> > 
>> > …
>> > 
>> > If this sounds OK to people, I can code up a utility that does this,
>> > which should probably belong in util-linux.
>> 
>> This sounds a lot like shadow's newuidmap and newgidmap [1,2,3].
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Trevor
>> 
>> [1]: https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/commit/673c2a6f9aa6c69588f4c1be08589b8d3475a520
>> [2]: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/newuidmap.1.html
>> [3]: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/subuid.5.html
>
> I think that mostly works.  No-one's packaging it yet, which is why I
> didn't notice.  It also looks like the build dependencies have vastly
> expanded, so I can't get it to build in the build service yet.

Both Fedora and Ubuntu should be packaging it.  Further Docker should
already be using these files.

> It looks like the only addition it needs is the setgroups flag for
> newgidmap, which the security people will need, so I can patch that. 
>  Plus it's trying to install newgidmap/newuidmap as setuid root rather
> than cap_setuid/cap_setgid, but that's fixable in the spec file.

I read the rest of this thread and I don't understand the setgroups flag
that you desire.  It sounds like someone with an incomplete grasp on the
situtation being cautious.

As far as I can tell the use cases for containers not supporting
setgroups is very limited.  Basically just using user namespaces to
drop privileges, and mapping the existing uids and gids to 0.

I don't think it actually makes sense to have a knob.  From a practical
standpoint entering any subordinate ids into the subgid file for a user
is a permission to use groups in such a way that can not use them as a
negative acl (because we allow them to be dropped).

Certainly it has been that way for quite a while now.

Except for the negative acl aspect there are no issues with dropping
groups, as setgroups will limit you to the groups allowed in your user
namespace.

Eric