From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49120)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1asay8-0004Qa-Vq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:05:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1asay2-00019a-B6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:05:52 -0400
Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.103]:47290)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1asay1-00019T-RY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:05:46 -0400
Received: from localhost
	by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use
	Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> from <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:05:44 +0100
Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
	(d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197])
	by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE1917D805A
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:06:17 +0100 (BST)
Received: from d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
	[9.149.37.229])
	by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with
	ESMTP id u3JJ5UpP6554062
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:05:30 GMT
Received: from d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with
	ESMTP id u3JJ5UDZ020102
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:05:30 -0600
From: Sascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160415153520.GI4341@noname.redhat.com>
References: <1460494796-12668-1-git-send-email-silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<878u0gih1h.fsf@oc4731375738.ibm.com>
	<20160415153520.GI4341@noname.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:05:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87wpnt5shx.fsf@oc4731375738.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [for-2.6] Re: [PATCH] qmp-commands.hx: document
 minimum speed for block jobs
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

Dear Kevin,

Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:

[...]
> Isn't the JSON schema (qapi/block-core.json) considered the
> authoritative source for interface specifications these days? I think if
> we want to document the shortcomings for the time being, we should
> document it in both places.

Interesting. What exactly is the relationship between qmp-commands.hx
and qapi/block-core.json?

At any rate, you're right that we should update both. See v2.

(And I've forgot the for-2.6 prefix for the patch itself again. Bah.)

Sascha
--=20
Softwareentwicklung Sascha Silbe, Niederhofenstra=C3=9Fe 5/1, 71229 Leonberg
https://se-silbe.de/
USt-IdNr. DE281696641