From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: Sources for 3.18-rc1 not uploaded Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:25:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87wq7t5o89.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20141020115943.GA27144@gmail.com> <20141020222809.GB223410@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> <54461483.9010600@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Michael J Gruber , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Junio C Hamano , infra-steering@kernel.org, Git Mailing List To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 21 19:27:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XgdD2-0002ww-Fi for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:27:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933345AbaJUR05 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:26:57 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:56220 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932849AbaJUR04 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:26:56 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55258 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgdCv-0007hG-QS; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:26:54 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6BE92E0648; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:25:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:25:34 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Michael J Gruber > wrote: >> >> Unfortunately, the git archive doc clearly says that the umask is >> applied to all archive entries. And that clearly wasn't the case (for >> extended metadata headers) before Brian's fix. > > Hey, it's time for another round of the world-famous "Captain Obvious > Quiz Game"! Yay! > > The questions these week are: > > (1) "If reality and documentation do not match, where is the bug?" > (a) Documentation is buggy > (b) Reality is buggy > > (2) "Where would you put the horse in relationship to a horse-drawn carriage?" > (a) in front > (b) in the carriage You are aware that a buggy _is_ a horse-drawn carriage? -- Captain Facepalm