From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core? Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 13:00:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87wqdruurf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <537008f06ceb8_8e47492f89f@nysa.notmuch> <53709788.2050201@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Felipe Contreras , git@vger.kernel.org, git-fc@googlegroups.com, Richard Hansen , Torsten =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6gershausen?= , Antoine Pelisse , Christophe Simonis , Dusty Phillips , Jeff King , John Keeping To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 12 13:01:36 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WjnzA-0006PC-K0 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:01:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752944AbaELLB3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 07:01:29 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:43141 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750752AbaELLB2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 07:01:28 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42174 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjnz2-00042w-Nl; Mon, 12 May 2014 07:01:25 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B39EE0F55; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:00:20 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <53709788.2050201@alum.mit.edu> (Michael Haggerty's message of "Mon, 12 May 2014 11:42:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael Haggerty writes: > This email is written in sorrow, not in anger. Felipe, you seem to > have so much potential. If you would put as much effort in conducting > social interactions as you do in coding, [...] I think that's where you are mistaken. We are not talking about a lack of effort here. It is just not spent conducively. -- David Kastrup