From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:30:32 -0700 Message-ID: <87wqn7w3qf.fsf@linaro.org> References: <20130827183313.aa7d51c6dd0b21cd8168aa35@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:56336 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752310Ab3H0Pag (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:30:36 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ld10so4905677pab.8 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:30:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130827183313.aa7d51c6dd0b21cd8168aa35@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:33:13 +1000") Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ezequiel Garcia , Jason Cooper Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c between commit f6cec7cd0777 ("ARM: mvebu: > remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes") from the tree and commit > 994c8c94b419 ("ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window > allocation") from the arm-soc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Fix looks correct, thanks. Kevin (for arm-soc folks) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:30:32 -0700 Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree In-Reply-To: <20130827183313.aa7d51c6dd0b21cd8168aa35@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:33:13 +1000") References: <20130827183313.aa7d51c6dd0b21cd8168aa35@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: <87wqn7w3qf.fsf@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c between commit f6cec7cd0777 ("ARM: mvebu: > remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes") from the tree and commit > 994c8c94b419 ("ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window > allocation") from the arm-soc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Fix looks correct, thanks. Kevin (for arm-soc folks) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753845Ab3H0Paj (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:30:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]:45097 "EHLO mail-pa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570Ab3H0Pag (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:30:36 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ezequiel Garcia , Jason Cooper Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pm tree References: <20130827183313.aa7d51c6dd0b21cd8168aa35@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:30:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20130827183313.aa7d51c6dd0b21cd8168aa35@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:33:13 +1000") Message-ID: <87wqn7w3qf.fsf@linaro.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c between commit f6cec7cd0777 ("ARM: mvebu: > remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes") from the tree and commit > 994c8c94b419 ("ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window > allocation") from the arm-soc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Fix looks correct, thanks. Kevin (for arm-soc folks)