From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Remove unused voltagedomain data for AM33xx Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:32:49 -0700 Message-ID: <87wqps959q.fsf@linaro.org> References: <1371474983-29296-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:57094 "EHLO mail-pb0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751087Ab3FQOcx (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:32:53 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rr13so2818272pbb.6 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:32:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1371474983-29296-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:46:21 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Rajendra Nayak Cc: paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Rajendra Nayak writes: > Hi, > > The powerdomain framework currently expects to always have a voltagedomain > associated with a given powerdomain. We already have AM33xx which > has no Voltage Controller/Voltage Processor as part of PRCM. > There are more SoCs' to follow starting with AM437x and DRA7xx > which do not have VC/VP. All these SoCs', hence do not support any > form of auto-scaling of voltages, that was possible on earlier OMAPs' > using the VFSM to trigger an i2c communication to the PMIC automatically > on hitting a low power state. > > Instead of adding dummy voltage domain data files, like was done for the > AM33xx case, make the powerdomain framework aware of the fact that some > SoCs' might not really have support for auto-scaling of voltages in hw. > > Patches are based of 3.10-rc6 and are boot tested on am335x bone. > > Rajendra Nayak (2): > ARM: OMAP2+: Powerdomain: Remove the need to always have a voltdm > associated to a pwrdm > ARM: AM33xx: Remove the unused voltagedomain data Thanks, queuing up this series with ack from Santosh and tested-by from Afzal. I'll try, but not sure if it can make it for v3.11. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:32:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Remove unused voltagedomain data for AM33xx In-Reply-To: <1371474983-29296-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:46:21 +0530") References: <1371474983-29296-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> Message-ID: <87wqps959q.fsf@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Rajendra Nayak writes: > Hi, > > The powerdomain framework currently expects to always have a voltagedomain > associated with a given powerdomain. We already have AM33xx which > has no Voltage Controller/Voltage Processor as part of PRCM. > There are more SoCs' to follow starting with AM437x and DRA7xx > which do not have VC/VP. All these SoCs', hence do not support any > form of auto-scaling of voltages, that was possible on earlier OMAPs' > using the VFSM to trigger an i2c communication to the PMIC automatically > on hitting a low power state. > > Instead of adding dummy voltage domain data files, like was done for the > AM33xx case, make the powerdomain framework aware of the fact that some > SoCs' might not really have support for auto-scaling of voltages in hw. > > Patches are based of 3.10-rc6 and are boot tested on am335x bone. > > Rajendra Nayak (2): > ARM: OMAP2+: Powerdomain: Remove the need to always have a voltdm > associated to a pwrdm > ARM: AM33xx: Remove the unused voltagedomain data Thanks, queuing up this series with ack from Santosh and tested-by from Afzal. I'll try, but not sure if it can make it for v3.11. Kevin