From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Anand S Sawant <sawant@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap2plus: smartreflex: remove sr debug directory in omap_sr_remove()
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:50:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrl65dwp.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296912744-4768-1-git-send-email-sawant@ti.com> (Anand S. Sawant's message of "Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:02:24 +0530")
Hi Anand,
Anand S Sawant <sawant@ti.com> writes:
> omap_sr_probe() creates the smartreflex debug directory and its
> underlying nvalue debug directory. These directories are removed in
> omap_sr_remove().
>
> Basic smartreflex functionality tested on OMAP3630 Zoom3 & OMAP4430 SDP
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand S Sawant <sawant@ti.com>
Looks good.
Please repost with the linux-arm-kernel list in CC:
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org. Thend, unless there are other
comments/objections, I'll queue this for 2.6.39.
Also, can summarize on which platforms this was tested. Just curious:
Were you able to build SR as a module to test this?
Kevin
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> index d7deadf..57df5cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct omap_sr {
> struct list_head node;
> struct omap_sr_nvalue_table *nvalue_table;
> struct voltagedomain *voltdm;
> + struct dentry *dbg_dir;
> };
>
> /* sr_list contains all the instances of smartreflex module */
> @@ -822,7 +823,7 @@ static int __init omap_sr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct omap_sr *sr_info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_sr), GFP_KERNEL);
> struct omap_sr_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> struct resource *mem, *irq;
> - struct dentry *vdd_dbg_dir, *dbg_dir, *nvalue_dir;
> + struct dentry *vdd_dbg_dir, *nvalue_dir;
> struct omap_volt_data *volt_data;
> int i, ret = 0;
>
> @@ -894,23 +895,24 @@ static int __init omap_sr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!vdd_dbg_dir)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - dbg_dir = debugfs_create_dir("smartreflex", vdd_dbg_dir);
> - if (IS_ERR(dbg_dir)) {
> + sr_info->dbg_dir = debugfs_create_dir("smartreflex", vdd_dbg_dir);
> + if (IS_ERR(sr_info->dbg_dir)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: Unable to create debugfs directory\n",
> __func__);
> - return PTR_ERR(dbg_dir);
> + return PTR_ERR(sr_info->dbg_dir);
> }
>
> - (void) debugfs_create_file("autocomp", S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO, dbg_dir,
> - (void *)sr_info, &pm_sr_fops);
> - (void) debugfs_create_x32("errweight", S_IRUGO, dbg_dir,
> + /* Using S_IWUSR to fix checkpatch warning */
> + (void) debugfs_create_file("autocomp", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + sr_info->dbg_dir, (void *)sr_info, &pm_sr_fops);
> + (void) debugfs_create_x32("errweight", S_IRUGO, sr_info->dbg_dir,
> &sr_info->err_weight);
> - (void) debugfs_create_x32("errmaxlimit", S_IRUGO, dbg_dir,
> + (void) debugfs_create_x32("errmaxlimit", S_IRUGO, sr_info->dbg_dir,
> &sr_info->err_maxlimit);
> - (void) debugfs_create_x32("errminlimit", S_IRUGO, dbg_dir,
> + (void) debugfs_create_x32("errminlimit", S_IRUGO, sr_info->dbg_dir,
> &sr_info->err_minlimit);
>
> - nvalue_dir = debugfs_create_dir("nvalue", dbg_dir);
> + nvalue_dir = debugfs_create_dir("nvalue", sr_info->dbg_dir);
> if (IS_ERR(nvalue_dir)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: Unable to create debugfs directory"
> "for n-values\n", __func__);
> @@ -974,6 +976,8 @@ static int __devexit omap_sr_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (sr_info->autocomp_active)
> sr_stop_vddautocomp(sr_info);
> + if (sr_info->dbg_dir)
> + debugfs_remove_recursive(sr_info->dbg_dir);
>
> list_del(&sr_info->node);
> iounmap(sr_info->base);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-05 13:32 [PATCH] omap2plus: smartreflex: remove sr debug directory in omap_sr_remove() Anand S Sawant
2011-02-11 23:50 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-02-15 5:26 ` Sawant, Anand
2011-02-15 16:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-17 16:09 ` Sawant, Anand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-17 15:57 sawant
2011-02-17 15:57 ` sawant at ti.com
2011-03-09 23:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-09 23:42 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wrl65dwp.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sawant@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.